19 posted 1 year ago by TheRealJameson 1 year ago by TheRealJameson +19 / -0 9 comments share 9 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (9) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 4 ▼ – Verrerogo 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0 Worrying here. If they are WAIVERING about one thing who knows WHAT ELSE they might eventually waiver on? Why assume it stops at witnesses? Maybe these mushy ones will actually vote to CONVICT him? Once you are in play, who knows how far you will go? Slippery slope? Please phone and politely express your uh concerns. Nicely. This business is far from over. Let us not get cocky. Perhaps this should be stickied with a red banner! permalink save report block reply
Worrying here.
If they are WAIVERING about one thing who knows WHAT ELSE they might eventually waiver on?
Why assume it stops at witnesses?
Maybe these mushy ones will actually vote to CONVICT him?
Once you are in play, who knows how far you will go? Slippery slope?
Please phone and politely express your uh concerns. Nicely. This business is far from over. Let us not get cocky.
Perhaps this should be stickied with a red banner!