Rand Paul could've just asked the question more simply: "Are you aware of any Obama administrators trying to overthrow this President?" There is overwhelming public evidence that the answer is Yes.
I agree. Him being specific is a lose lose to this judge. He censors it means he's protecting one side, he answers he has to say yes to the question. Lol an this is a judge.
Rand Paul could've just asked the question more simply: "Are you aware of any Obama administrators trying to overthrow this President?" There is overwhelming public evidence that the answer is Yes.
Not specific enough. Freeze the target, personalize it.
I agree. Him being specific is a lose lose to this judge. He censors it means he's protecting one side, he answers he has to say yes to the question. Lol an this is a judge.