WTF is ‘rounding up of viewpoints’ and how is that supposed to hurt us?
Be anon., like the internet intended.
Reality doesn’t let you go back and delete the stupid things you say, and neither does this websi— oh wait there are little buttons that let you edit your comments and delete your posts!
There are tons of posts about mass surveillance, including aerial wide area persistent collection, FISA, national security letter abuses, geolocation, data aggregation, and five eyes abuses, sourced with links and quoted, including a New York Times article that tracks President Trump during a workday using geolocation data from his secret service detail.
There are articles discussing 2nd Amendment issues from both classical liberal viewpoints, scientific articles about how guns provide defensive protection even when they aren’t drawn, articles and memes about guns protecting minority rights and women’s safety, etc... Whether Melania ‘likes’ guns isn’t really relevant; plenty of people don’t like motorcycles but that doesn’t mean they want to seize yours, and President Trump has shown his trademark mix of clear rhetoric, good political strategy, and great tactical timing, all showing his commitment to protecting your second amendment and other individual rights.
There is plenty of criticism of Barr and other members of the administration, but frankly nobody knows exactly what happened except for people who likely can’t talk about it for many of the same reasons that apply alike to other coup, ‘Q’, and ‘Shrew’ - a corrupted justice system we have little choice but to attempt to rehabilitate as an institution while leftists try to tear it down and delegitimize our constitution... if you have ideas on how to do that better, or some other good incite, tell us about that instead of about how your feelings are hurt by imaginary things.
And yes, your best brand option right now is Trump. That’s what this site is all about. Be thankful he bought you 8 years of no globalism and is teaching other Republicans how to win.
Complaining is for leftists. Roll up your sleeves and smile when you ride through ‘Trump country’
Melania’s personal feelings about the second amendment have no more bearing on your president’s official policy than your dad’s feelings about communism had on your college electives sign-up sheet.
She stands by her man, and he stands for the constitution.
Find a different division conspiracy to peddle, invent some better evidence to argue, or at least practice your rhetorical skills - you make lil’ Adam Schiff look like Clarence Darrow.
So then discuss red flag laws and skip the ad hominem attacks. There are a lot of people who think so-called ‘red flag’ laws make sense, until they hear the full story; just as there are people who think ‘hate speech’ laws or ‘affirmative action’ makes sense - that’s policy debate.
Policy debate is something YOU CAN HELP DO! - if you can contribute something useful and be persuasive.
Then there’s the difficult job of politically getting policy enacted. <<TRUMP BRAND HERE
That’s why we all like him so much, he keeps winning at this.
To continue doing that he needs ‘political capital’. AND HERE YOU CAN ALSO HELP! By standing firmly behind your President even when he faces into the headwinds, or takes some politically expedient step in the policy-shepherding, vote-wrangling, political horse-trading, or bully-pulpiting that takes a little extra faith on your part... as he expertly did with the last round of gun-grabbing attempts. That’s also how you make it possible for him to go further, possibly with legislation like nationwide concealed-carry, for instance.
WTF is ‘rounding up of viewpoints’ and how is that supposed to hurt us?
Be anon., like the internet intended.
Reality doesn’t let you go back and delete the stupid things you say, and neither does this websi— oh wait there are little buttons that let you edit your comments and delete your posts!
There are tons of posts about mass surveillance, including aerial wide area persistent collection, FISA, national security letter abuses, geolocation, data aggregation, and five eyes abuses, sourced with links and quoted, including a New York Times article that tracks President Trump during a workday using geolocation data from his secret service detail.
There are articles discussing 2nd Amendment issues from both classical liberal viewpoints, scientific articles about how guns provide defensive protection even when they aren’t drawn, articles and memes about guns protecting minority rights and women’s safety, etc... Whether Melania ‘likes’ guns isn’t really relevant; plenty of people don’t like motorcycles but that doesn’t mean they want to seize yours, and President Trump has shown his trademark mix of clear rhetoric, good political strategy, and great tactical timing, all showing his commitment to protecting your second amendment and other individual rights.
There is plenty of criticism of Barr and other members of the administration, but frankly nobody knows exactly what happened except for people who likely can’t talk about it for many of the same reasons that apply alike to other coup, ‘Q’, and ‘Shrew’ - a corrupted justice system we have little choice but to attempt to rehabilitate as an institution while leftists try to tear it down and delegitimize our constitution... if you have ideas on how to do that better, or some other good incite, tell us about that instead of about how your feelings are hurt by imaginary things.
And yes, your best brand option right now is Trump. That’s what this site is all about. Be thankful he bought you 8 years of no globalism and is teaching other Republicans how to win.
Complaining is for leftists. Roll up your sleeves and smile when you ride through ‘Trump country’
Melania’s personal feelings about the second amendment have no more bearing on your president’s official policy than your dad’s feelings about communism had on your college electives sign-up sheet.
She stands by her man, and he stands for the constitution.
Find a different division conspiracy to peddle, invent some better evidence to argue, or at least practice your rhetorical skills - you make lil’ Adam Schiff look like Clarence Darrow.
Be Best
So then discuss red flag laws and skip the ad hominem attacks. There are a lot of people who think so-called ‘red flag’ laws make sense, until they hear the full story; just as there are people who think ‘hate speech’ laws or ‘affirmative action’ makes sense - that’s policy debate.
Policy debate is something YOU CAN HELP DO! - if you can contribute something useful and be persuasive.
Then there’s the difficult job of politically getting policy enacted. <<TRUMP BRAND HERE
That’s why we all like him so much, he keeps winning at this.
To continue doing that he needs ‘political capital’. AND HERE YOU CAN ALSO HELP! By standing firmly behind your President even when he faces into the headwinds, or takes some politically expedient step in the policy-shepherding, vote-wrangling, political horse-trading, or bully-pulpiting that takes a little extra faith on your part... as he expertly did with the last round of gun-grabbing attempts. That’s also how you make it possible for him to go further, possibly with legislation like nationwide concealed-carry, for instance.
Thanks for the response, and MAGA!