This, this, THIS!!! I don't know why this exact question isn't being asked - not just Mittens, but to everyone who voted for more witnesses, then voted to convict.

Why did you want more witnesses if the House Managers presented a "beyond a reasonable doubt" case? Or, if you were not completely convinced by the House Managers' case, why did you vote to convict?

Beyond a shadow government of a doubt...

He said he needed Bolton to find exonerating evidence for Trump. Apparently he assumed Trump was guilty from the beginning.

He broke one of the ten commandments in his speech: thou shalt not bear false witness.

In the Book of Mormon, Nephi says "Wo unto the liar, for they shall be thrust down to hell."

He also claimed God told him to convict. That is a violation of the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain.

Someone needs to explain to Pierre Delicto Cornholio what presumption of innocence means. If you need more evidence then the person is innocent, if you don't then they could be guilty. It never goes the other way you worthless lying cuck.

He always intended to vote the way he did. It's really not that surprising. However, since he did, #RemoveRomney.

The entry of Utah into the Union was delayed many years because the proposed state constitution included polygamy.

:The More you Momo.

You should delete your commentary.

Your title alone stands as a gem of concisely summarized truth.

He has a personal vendetta. That's how.