121
Let me get this straight...Romney votes for more witnesses, because the case isn't proven, then he doesn't get them and STILL votes guilty??
posted ago by FreeSpeechMaster ago by FreeSpeechMaster +121 / -0
16 comments
16 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (16)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 8 ▼
– spez_this 8 points ago +8 / -0

This, this, THIS!!! I don't know why this exact question isn't being asked - not just Mittens, but to everyone who voted for more witnesses, then voted to convict.

Why did you want more witnesses if the House Managers presented a "beyond a reasonable doubt" case? Or, if you were not completely convinced by the House Managers' case, why did you vote to convict?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DrBJTester 3 points ago +3 / -0

Brilliant

permalink parent save report block reply