121 Let me get this straight...Romney votes for more witnesses, because the case isn't proven, then he doesn't get them and STILL votes guilty?? posted 1 year ago by FreeSpeechMaster 1 year ago by FreeSpeechMaster +121 / -0 16 comments share 16 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (16) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 4 ▼ – DrBJTester 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0 Someone needs to explain to Pierre Delicto Cornholio what presumption of innocence means. If you need more evidence then the person is innocent, if you don't then they could be guilty. It never goes the other way you worthless lying cuck. permalink save report block reply
Someone needs to explain to Pierre Delicto Cornholio what presumption of innocence means. If you need more evidence then the person is innocent, if you don't then they could be guilty. It never goes the other way you worthless lying cuck.