262 Article Vanished: Suspicious ‘Rounding Errors’ Resulting in Extra Delegates That Over 50% of the Time Went to Pete Buttplug! good thing it was archived, huh? (archive.is) posted 1 year ago by Isolated_Patriot 1 year ago by Isolated_Patriot +262 / -0 7 comments share 7 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (7) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 6 ▼ – Lol_Garrus 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0 Why so complicated? Its not fucking hard. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – NotProgCensored 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0 Latest vote count. Sanders 30% of Dem votes. Bootygig 120% Warren 30% Biden 90% of Dem votes. (will definitely rise during the re-canvass) permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – nero2003 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0 Democrats can't do math?!!? WHAT? THEY BELIEVE IN SCIENCE! Edit: They posted an explanation. They round this way to assign the extra delegate that would otherwise not be assigned. This is how the dems designed their process: https://smartelections.us/iowa-new-math permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – krzyzowiec 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0 It only cost Pete a few tens of thousands. Totally worth it. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Artymisfoul 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0 Rules state extra delegate goes to one with highest not rounded up number. Fake news onbthis. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – BigRedPillMachine 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0 What mongs do the Iowa Dems have filling out these sheets? No consistency with names...Pete, Bernie, and Amy being first names and then switching to Biden, Warren. Lack of basic math skills No new delegate card when you make a typo, just scratch it out...with a pen permalink save report block reply
Why so complicated? Its not fucking hard.
Latest vote count.
Sanders 30% of Dem votes.
Bootygig 120%
Warren 30%
Biden 90% of Dem votes. (will definitely rise during the re-canvass)
Democrats can't do math?!!? WHAT? THEY BELIEVE IN SCIENCE!
Edit: They posted an explanation. They round this way to assign the extra delegate that would otherwise not be assigned. This is how the dems designed their process:
https://smartelections.us/iowa-new-math
It only cost Pete a few tens of thousands. Totally worth it.
Rules state extra delegate goes to one with highest not rounded up number. Fake news onbthis.
What mongs do the Iowa Dems have filling out these sheets?
No consistency with names...Pete, Bernie, and Amy being first names and then switching to Biden, Warren.
Lack of basic math skills
No new delegate card when you make a typo, just scratch it out...with a pen