Are you sure you are not reaching just a bit to feign indignation? I'll agree that the post may seem mistitled IF Pete ISNT a pedo, and I can agree I have no first, second, or thirdhand knowledge to confirm nor deny, but where does it say YOU? Correct me if I'm wrong without assumptions, please.
I'm not feigning indignation. The post was titled "SAY NO TO PEDOS" and it listed every stupid stereotype you can, cum guzzling, ass eating, AIDS, whatever. That's not funny or lighthearted or cute. This board is about GEOTUS and he's been nothing but supporting of gays. It's just stupid and unnecessary to sticky a post like that.
Firstly, thank you for responding. I can respect that you find it in poor taste and/or offensive but stereotypes are not off-limits in the context of overall free speech. Follow-up question, is your main contention that it was stickied?
I don't care about Pete. He'll fade. I'm pissed that the mods here thought it was cool to call me a pedo just because I'm gay.
Are you sure you are not reaching just a bit to feign indignation? I'll agree that the post may seem mistitled IF Pete ISNT a pedo, and I can agree I have no first, second, or thirdhand knowledge to confirm nor deny, but where does it say YOU? Correct me if I'm wrong without assumptions, please.
I'm not feigning indignation. The post was titled "SAY NO TO PEDOS" and it listed every stupid stereotype you can, cum guzzling, ass eating, AIDS, whatever. That's not funny or lighthearted or cute. This board is about GEOTUS and he's been nothing but supporting of gays. It's just stupid and unnecessary to sticky a post like that.
Firstly, thank you for responding. I can respect that you find it in poor taste and/or offensive but stereotypes are not off-limits in the context of overall free speech. Follow-up question, is your main contention that it was stickied?