Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
And also, "throw 'em up against the wall and frisk 'em" without a warrant is a pretty vile violation of innocent until proven guilty. Statistics or not, police shouldn't be able to do something like that solely because of someone's skin color.
Lots of us just don't care anymore. You're hanging out on the street corner at 2am talking to random passerbys in a drug area that's enough for me search em with a dog for all I care. Im sick of the tolerance, and I'll tell you the other truth if things don't change quickly the pendulum will swing back the other way to an extreme very quickly and a lot of people won't like what that looks like
It’s “true” that freeways and highways are ‘known drug-trafficking routes’.
Does this give the highway patrol the legal right or moral justification to stop your travel with NO REASON, search your vehicle, seize any weapons you might be carrying, demand your ‘papers’, force you to account for your activities, and run your name against various databases to see if they can discover any other reason you can be further detained?
Yes if you look like the proce whi have been caught go for it. Everyone knows it's mostly Mexicans blacks Africans and other 3rd world groups don't the majority of it.. call me a racist, I don't carew ive been called racist so many times since trump was elected last for saying I voted for trump I just don't care anymore and ive seen w.h.o commits thr crimes when places like new york York they don't prosecute crimes under 900 bucks... and guess what it ain't white people.
Racial profiling has existed for hundreds of thousands of years as a defense mechanism. Denying its existence is wrong. Causing innocents harm because you refuse to profile is wrong.
Our bill of rights says otherwise. Your logic is no different than that used by the “muh whites ‘r’raciiists” crowd.
If they get into power, should your guns be seized? Should you be thrown against the wall and searched without warrant or cause?
Just this week the FBI director described a rise in ‘reported hate crimes’ and implied that ‘white supremacy ideology’ was a major cause. Were his statistics more or less accurate than Bloombergs?
How are statistics affected by definitions and feedback loops?
It’s easy to dismiss injustice when it happens to other people. That’s why authoritarians point their government powers first at those they’ve made powerless and smeared.
Can you see where this road takes you, irredeemable deplorables?
I kind of agree with you, but at the same time they are speaking of some basic realities. Reality always trumps generality (statistics).
The irredeemable deplorables is a narrative; it was never true. MS13, the gang of Mexicans, South American, etc. is a reality. The Great White Threat of white-male shooters is a narrative. The skin color of the locals who commit most of the shop-lifting is a reality.
Your points are generally well made; you described well the differences between narrative and reality.
Just remember that narratives have a way of becoming reality due to the feedback loop effects. Its the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle writ large; the definitions create the measurements, the measurements affect the results.
For example, consider a simplified exploration of your ‘shoplifting’ example (we’ll ignore many related multifaceted points of context):
Instead of limiting ‘theft’ to shoplifting, count all forms of theft, like white-collar fraud, money laundering, insider trading, (and ‘rent-seeking & so-called ‘wage theft’ if you want).
Now add up the total monetary amounts of the theft divided by the various skin color of the perpetrators. If ‘whites’ ’stole’ more than ‘blacks’ under this accounting, would you reverse your “reality”? Would warrantless searches and gun seizures be more or less acceptable for any given community? What about warrantless searches of financial and business data?
...and these issues raise their little monster-heads before you even get into purposeful manipulation of statistics for political purposes.
We already tried”bringing super-predators to heel”thanks to Cankles.
Trump offers a vision for a path forward that’s built onopportunities for self-reliance, respect for rights, equal application of justice, and color-blind enforcement policy.It will be a long road with many things adjusted to address real-world dilemmas but like he said:”What do we have to lose?”
No offense buddy, but your approach puts way too much faith in big government, and seems like it ultimately rests on the false notion that it will never happen to you.
The reason proglibs dislike facts is because they simply mirror current realities, not so-called casual factors or potential outcomes.
IOW, it's the baseline justification for massive gov't intervention in order to alter ("improve") existing socio-economic dynamics.
What MB is implying is that before cultural regrowth can occur in inner cities, hard tactics (ie anti civil rights) that break the cycle of violence must first be imposed.
It might help cons if they better understood the motivations of the left. Rather than paint them as ridiculous cartoon characters, either evil doers or buffoons, realize that most have positive objectives.
The problem however, is that leftists strongarm tactics invariably fail and lead to tyranny. That's the point of rationale, informed debate, not surface level soundbites.
Those same strongarm anti civil rights tactics created the problem. More government isn’t going to solve it anymore than seizing an innocent guy’s defensive weapon in an illegal search ‘solves’ his ‘gang victim’ problems.
7% of the population cause 50% of the crime. Police need to profile to use resources correctly. There are not infinite amounts of police officers around.
And should you and your family also be profiled? Based on what? Your skin color? Your address? Your income? Whether a government official can gin up the right statistic? Whether the media can convince people that “Trump rallies account for the vast majority of violent confrontations between hate groups”?
I want the muslim at the airport profiled every time dude. Majority of muslims in the usa and around the world are le omar, are le tkalib, are like linda sarsor. And I don't care if it offends them. White people get profiled in china but whites don't bitch about it. And if there was an epidemic of whites blowing up buildings or trying to hurt people in airports and most whites weren't speaking out against it, I would expect to be profiled too and wouldn't be mad about it
Islam is not a race. China doesn’t have a Bill of Rights. You seem to be mixing up a whole bunch of unrelated ideas into an angry soup. You do seem to be mad about it, you’re here gettin’ yer bitchn on, aintcha?
I said muslims not islam you illiterate retard. And you missed my point entirely about me complaining vs understanding and not bitching about why another country would profile certain groups more than others... you're really proving my points about race right maybe you should quit while you're behind
Mike should have done his homework. The left does not like facts. He spoke the truth about violent minorities being the cause of most violent crimes in the country. Now they'll destroy him for it, because facts are "racist". This is entirely his fault, though. He should never have attempted to run on the CUCK ticket.
‘Violent minorities’ is a consequence of policies, not a natural inborn trait, just like the rates of absentee fathers. And Bloomer is the prime example of a neoliberal RINO authoritarian ruler that keeps perpetuating those policies.
If you go back to a time before DEMOCRATS created our current GHETTOS, rates of black nuclear families, black community violence, and black workforce participation tell a far different story.
That’s why these communities of our fellow Americans will not stay marginalized and trapped into identity-politics enforced ghettos for long under MAGA!
"‘Violent minorities’ is a consequence of policies, not a natural inborn trait, just like the rates of absentee fathers."
Sounds nice, but it's wrong. No matter where they are, no matter their opportunities, they will always have a higher rate of violent crime than whites. This has been shown time and time again. There are exceptions, of course, but those exceptions have to work hard to be what they are, to the point that they might be considered mutations.
You talk like they've never had a chance to get out of the ghetto.This is also wrong. They've had the chance, and chose not to. And now they even take pride in that fact. Their 'Nation' is their ghetto, and their tribe is their family (or gang). That's all they will ever be loyal to.
Do I hate them? No. But I will not use "I'm not a racist" as an excuse to ignore the truth.
This is correct. When you look at crime rates among american blacks, and crime rates in countries in africa, with or without nuclear families, the crime rates are remarkably similar (though I tend to believe the crime rates in african countrys are underreported). People don't like to hear this but it's true when you look at and compare averages across races. Blacks and Mexicans are more likely to commit more violent crimes than whites regardless of social status, poverty, nuclear family etc. Whites are more likely to commit more violent crimes than asians. These things are true across the world. Sorry guys. Doesn't mean the aren't good blacks or good Mexicans, certainly there are, but we're talking about average here. And it's just the truth
You’ve made some ‘data-driven’ assertions. Assuming your data is accurate, you should also be able to discuss counterpoints for each of these assertions.
For example, how are the devastating effects of highly abstracted economic and military action included or excluded into your definitions of “violent crime”?
Compare a U.S. soldier on orders to guard a supply line route used by a local poppy grower allied with the U.S.-backed Afghanistan government, who shoots a poacher trespassing on the poppy fields because that poacher raised and fired his weapon... with a dropout from a failing inner-city high school who shoots a local drug dealer that threatened his sister for witnessing gang activity.
How would you go about determining which is a greater or lesser crime, legally or morally? How would you account for your choices for the simplified definition of “violent crime”?
Rather than ‘prove me wrong,’ explore the issue yourself and make up your own possible mitigating factors. Consider how ‘grey’ these seemingly simple reported statistics can become at scale. One must not lose oneself in the fog of ambiguity, but one must also not address present realities with a conviction brought on by dichotomous wordviews.
Possibly, but the ‘single parent households’ problem for black communities has multiple policy root causes and reinforcing feedback loops in policy, culture, and economics.
Those communities have also been trapped into those feedback loops for at least a half-century.
There will be no quick and easy fix. But without basic protection of their God-given rights, the task of fixing this mess created by paternalistic government can’t really even get started.
the fuck is your problem? you're like working overtime in this thread at being a douche.
we're not talking about Mini Mike's stances on every issue under the sun. this thread is about one short clip regarding minority crime and gun control and there is nothing factually incorrect in anythin Mini Mike said in this clip.
EASY there big fella! You were only congratulated for using logic, and encouraged to expand your search.
‘Stop and Frisk’ is a policy at the NEXUS of many leftist ideological strings of thought. Imagine Bloomy as the President, enacting ‘stop and frisk’ in your neighborhood, using crime statistics gathered by Chris Wray, an interpretation of ‘racial justice’ put forward by his Secretary for Homeland Security, Maxine Waters, and enforcement officers pulled from Chicago’s Homan Square.
Don’t let leftist thinking pull you down into ‘rights-exemption zones’ and identity-politics racism, just because it seems ‘urgent’, ‘common-sense’, or ‘only for the really bad guys’.
I think he was never in this to win; he is just a cash cow for the DNC. To be honest, it doesn't seem like any of them are trying to win to me. So, idk.
I agree with him he's absolutely right and it's high time people start admitting these things out loud without fear or care of being called racist. The rest of us have to live here too and we are sick of the crimes being ignored, or even tolerated and encouraged because the R word is being held over everyone's head
How is the first step act working out? Oh yeah they're just reoffending. Sorry man I used to believe everyone was equal we were ll just need to get along, the government policies are responsible for creating those situations etc etc. Then I grew up and saw white kids and black kids in the same neighborhoods with very similar upbringings in the home and similar culture around them, go totally different routes. And there's lots of research that explains why it is this way. Blacks on AVERAGE are different from whites on AVERAGE. There is so much evidence around. Crime stats are similar across country's all over the world because as a group blacks commit similar levels of crime in EVERY CITY under EVERY GOVERNMENT in EVERY COUNTRY. You want a great example? Look at Liberia, they copied our constitution almost word for word and tried to implement it. You know what happened? It turned into just another failed african country, just like rhodesia did when whites were driven out and blacks starved because they were too stupid to do what white farmers did. And yet, the blacks in south africa doing exactly what the rhodesians did, going after white farmers, don't seem to have learned a thing from it. Why? Because they are stupid that's why. When whites were painting works of art and building magnificent cathedrals what were Africans doing? The same thing they had been doing for thousands of years. Not building not inventing nor creating, just existing. You can make the argument that this is because whites had resources that Africans did not but im not inclined to believe it since whites improved the same areas when they traveled there far before industrialization. Africa is also lush with resources and always has been. Look man I'm not saying we can't be friends I'm not saying you aren't my fellow country man, I'm not saying you aren't an american, or anything like that. Im saying there are things that are true no matter how much we might want them not to be and that pretending these truths don't exist only harms us as a country. That's all.
Here's the deal, you can either read and reply (you already did but obviously don't know how to approach the facts I spelled out) on the stuff i brought up.. or you can act like a prissy little head up his own asshole faggot like you're doing right now. I don't really care either way because facts aren't changing anytime soon. If you want to understand why things are they way they actually are then that's a different matter but I don't think you do because you still clearly cling to the everyone is totally equal anyone who comes to america can be and act like an american in the spirit of the founders (even though the founders also already knew the basic truths about race... fun fact after freeing the slaves Lincoln wanted them sent back to africa.. I wish he would have)
An entire semester of HON350-‘Urban Planning & Governance’ could be spent untangling the causes and consequences of the unjust, unconstitutional, and faulty policy ideas wrapped within this single Bloomberg recording.
This guy ran one of the largest U.S. cities. He owns a giant media ‘news’ source that didn’t report this story, he’s financing gun-grabber groups around the country, and he’s basically leveraging a ‘buyout’ of an entire major U.S. political party.
Discussion topics might include:
Broken Windows policing,
Racial Profiling,
State Agency Militarization,
Government Paternalism,
Policy-Created Ghettos,
Political Hypocrisy,
Evidence-based Policymaking,
Community Policing,
Abuse of Powers,
Predictive Policing,
Stop and Frisk,
Gun Seizure Consequences,
Corruption,
Unequal justice,
4th Amendment,
2nd Amendment,
Defensive gun use,
Civil Rights protections,
Due process,
Enforcement bias,
Identity Politics,
Gang power enablement,
Income divide,
School to prison pipeline,
Data analysis,
Black-box enforcement algorithms,
Algorithmic feedback loops,
Media conglomeration,
Reporters conflicts of Interest,
Censorship
This. It's going to go over like a lead balloon with the virtue signaling crowd.
And also, "throw 'em up against the wall and frisk 'em" without a warrant is a pretty vile violation of innocent until proven guilty. Statistics or not, police shouldn't be able to do something like that solely because of someone's skin color.
Lots of us just don't care anymore. You're hanging out on the street corner at 2am talking to random passerbys in a drug area that's enough for me search em with a dog for all I care. Im sick of the tolerance, and I'll tell you the other truth if things don't change quickly the pendulum will swing back the other way to an extreme very quickly and a lot of people won't like what that looks like
It’s “true” that freeways and highways are ‘known drug-trafficking routes’.
Does this give the highway patrol the legal right or moral justification to stop your travel with NO REASON, search your vehicle, seize any weapons you might be carrying, demand your ‘papers’, force you to account for your activities, and run your name against various databases to see if they can discover any other reason you can be further detained?
Yes if you look like the proce whi have been caught go for it. Everyone knows it's mostly Mexicans blacks Africans and other 3rd world groups don't the majority of it.. call me a racist, I don't carew ive been called racist so many times since trump was elected last for saying I voted for trump I just don't care anymore and ive seen w.h.o commits thr crimes when places like new york York they don't prosecute crimes under 900 bucks... and guess what it ain't white people.
No. THAT’S WRONG. Your individual rights are not dependent upon the guilt or innocence of other people who look like you.
Your reasoning is antithetical to the bill of rights, the very concept of due process, and frankly, it’s the very definition of bigotry.
Don’t be trapped into false dichotomies.
Racial profiling has existed for hundreds of thousands of years as a defense mechanism. Denying its existence is wrong. Causing innocents harm because you refuse to profile is wrong.
Our bill of rights says otherwise. Your logic is no different than that used by the “muh whites ‘r’raciiists” crowd.
If they get into power, should your guns be seized? Should you be thrown against the wall and searched without warrant or cause?
Just this week the FBI director described a rise in ‘reported hate crimes’ and implied that ‘white supremacy ideology’ was a major cause. Were his statistics more or less accurate than Bloombergs?
How are statistics affected by definitions and feedback loops?
It’s easy to dismiss injustice when it happens to other people. That’s why authoritarians point their government powers first at those they’ve made powerless and smeared.
Can you see where this road takes you, irredeemable deplorables?
I kind of agree with you, but at the same time they are speaking of some basic realities. Reality always trumps generality (statistics).
The irredeemable deplorables is a narrative; it was never true. MS13, the gang of Mexicans, South American, etc. is a reality. The Great White Threat of white-male shooters is a narrative. The skin color of the locals who commit most of the shop-lifting is a reality.
Your points are generally well made; you described well the differences between narrative and reality.
Just remember that narratives have a way of becoming reality due to the feedback loop effects. Its the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle writ large; the definitions create the measurements, the measurements affect the results.
For example, consider a simplified exploration of your ‘shoplifting’ example (we’ll ignore many related multifaceted points of context):
Instead of limiting ‘theft’ to shoplifting, count all forms of theft, like white-collar fraud, money laundering, insider trading, (and ‘rent-seeking & so-called ‘wage theft’ if you want).
Now add up the total monetary amounts of the theft divided by the various skin color of the perpetrators. If ‘whites’ ’stole’ more than ‘blacks’ under this accounting, would you reverse your “reality”? Would warrantless searches and gun seizures be more or less acceptable for any given community? What about warrantless searches of financial and business data?
...and these issues raise their little monster-heads before you even get into purposeful manipulation of statistics for political purposes.
We already tried ”bringing super-predators to heel” thanks to Cankles.
Trump offers a vision for a path forward that’s built on opportunities for self-reliance, respect for rights, equal application of justice, and color-blind enforcement policy. It will be a long road with many things adjusted to address real-world dilemmas but like he said: ”What do we have to lose?”
No offense buddy, but your approach puts way too much faith in big government, and seems like it ultimately rests on the false notion that it will never happen to you.
The reason proglibs dislike facts is because they simply mirror current realities, not so-called casual factors or potential outcomes.
IOW, it's the baseline justification for massive gov't intervention in order to alter ("improve") existing socio-economic dynamics.
What MB is implying is that before cultural regrowth can occur in inner cities, hard tactics (ie anti civil rights) that break the cycle of violence must first be imposed.
It might help cons if they better understood the motivations of the left. Rather than paint them as ridiculous cartoon characters, either evil doers or buffoons, realize that most have positive objectives.
The problem however, is that leftists strongarm tactics invariably fail and lead to tyranny. That's the point of rationale, informed debate, not surface level soundbites.
Those same strongarm anti civil rights tactics created the problem. More government isn’t going to solve it anymore than seizing an innocent guy’s defensive weapon in an illegal search ‘solves’ his ‘gang victim’ problems.
7% of the population cause 50% of the crime. Police need to profile to use resources correctly. There are not infinite amounts of police officers around.
And should you and your family also be profiled? Based on what? Your skin color? Your address? Your income? Whether a government official can gin up the right statistic? Whether the media can convince people that “Trump rallies account for the vast majority of violent confrontations between hate groups”?
I want the muslim at the airport profiled every time dude. Majority of muslims in the usa and around the world are le omar, are le tkalib, are like linda sarsor. And I don't care if it offends them. White people get profiled in china but whites don't bitch about it. And if there was an epidemic of whites blowing up buildings or trying to hurt people in airports and most whites weren't speaking out against it, I would expect to be profiled too and wouldn't be mad about it
Islam is not a race. China doesn’t have a Bill of Rights. You seem to be mixing up a whole bunch of unrelated ideas into an angry soup. You do seem to be mad about it, you’re here gettin’ yer bitchn on, aintcha?
I said muslims not islam you illiterate retard. And you missed my point entirely about me complaining vs understanding and not bitching about why another country would profile certain groups more than others... you're really proving my points about race right maybe you should quit while you're behind
You ain’t running that heap on the topmost fuel grade, are ya, speedracer?
Mike should have done his homework. The left does not like facts. He spoke the truth about violent minorities being the cause of most violent crimes in the country. Now they'll destroy him for it, because facts are "racist". This is entirely his fault, though. He should never have attempted to run on the CUCK ticket.
‘Violent minorities’ is a consequence of policies, not a natural inborn trait, just like the rates of absentee fathers. And Bloomer is the prime example of a neoliberal RINO authoritarian ruler that keeps perpetuating those policies.
If you go back to a time before DEMOCRATS created our current GHETTOS, rates of black nuclear families, black community violence, and black workforce participation tell a far different story.
That’s why these communities of our fellow Americans will not stay marginalized and trapped into identity-politics enforced ghettos for long under MAGA!
"‘Violent minorities’ is a consequence of policies, not a natural inborn trait, just like the rates of absentee fathers."
Sounds nice, but it's wrong. No matter where they are, no matter their opportunities, they will always have a higher rate of violent crime than whites. This has been shown time and time again. There are exceptions, of course, but those exceptions have to work hard to be what they are, to the point that they might be considered mutations.
You talk like they've never had a chance to get out of the ghetto.This is also wrong. They've had the chance, and chose not to. And now they even take pride in that fact. Their 'Nation' is their ghetto, and their tribe is their family (or gang). That's all they will ever be loyal to.
Do I hate them? No. But I will not use "I'm not a racist" as an excuse to ignore the truth.
Watch as I now get downvoted and possibly banned!
This is correct. When you look at crime rates among american blacks, and crime rates in countries in africa, with or without nuclear families, the crime rates are remarkably similar (though I tend to believe the crime rates in african countrys are underreported). People don't like to hear this but it's true when you look at and compare averages across races. Blacks and Mexicans are more likely to commit more violent crimes than whites regardless of social status, poverty, nuclear family etc. Whites are more likely to commit more violent crimes than asians. These things are true across the world. Sorry guys. Doesn't mean the aren't good blacks or good Mexicans, certainly there are, but we're talking about average here. And it's just the truth
You’ve made some ‘data-driven’ assertions. Assuming your data is accurate, you should also be able to discuss counterpoints for each of these assertions.
For example, how are the devastating effects of highly abstracted economic and military action included or excluded into your definitions of “violent crime”?
Compare a U.S. soldier on orders to guard a supply line route used by a local poppy grower allied with the U.S.-backed Afghanistan government, who shoots a poacher trespassing on the poppy fields because that poacher raised and fired his weapon... with a dropout from a failing inner-city high school who shoots a local drug dealer that threatened his sister for witnessing gang activity.
How would you go about determining which is a greater or lesser crime, legally or morally? How would you account for your choices for the simplified definition of “violent crime”?
Rather than ‘prove me wrong,’ explore the issue yourself and make up your own possible mitigating factors. Consider how ‘grey’ these seemingly simple reported statistics can become at scale. One must not lose oneself in the fog of ambiguity, but one must also not address present realities with a conviction brought on by dichotomous wordviews.
Oh. You're just a gamma. I should've guessed.
Edit: Inb4 Chopblock declares himself the 'winner' despite having no more proof or any better arguments than I do...
Demonetizing single parent household doles will quickly force people relying on public subsidies for income to return to nuclear families.
Possibly, but the ‘single parent households’ problem for black communities has multiple policy root causes and reinforcing feedback loops in policy, culture, and economics.
Those communities have also been trapped into those feedback loops for at least a half-century.
There will be no quick and easy fix. But without basic protection of their God-given rights, the task of fixing this mess created by paternalistic government can’t really even get started.
Truth is gonna bite mini mike in the woke demographics.
Nothing wrong with what he said. It's factually correct.
Problem is, his anti-gun stance will not take guns out of the hands of the people committing crimes. These people are getting guns illegally.
Congratulations! You found one thing wrong with what he said. Keep searching, it’s like a bad policy crossword puzzle of authoritarian ideas.
the fuck is your problem? you're like working overtime in this thread at being a douche.
we're not talking about Mini Mike's stances on every issue under the sun. this thread is about one short clip regarding minority crime and gun control and there is nothing factually incorrect in anythin Mini Mike said in this clip.
calm the fuck down
EASY there big fella! You were only congratulated for using logic, and encouraged to expand your search.
‘Stop and Frisk’ is a policy at the NEXUS of many leftist ideological strings of thought. Imagine Bloomy as the President, enacting ‘stop and frisk’ in your neighborhood, using crime statistics gathered by Chris Wray, an interpretation of ‘racial justice’ put forward by his Secretary for Homeland Security, Maxine Waters, and enforcement officers pulled from Chicago’s Homan Square.
Don’t let leftist thinking pull you down into ‘rights-exemption zones’ and identity-politics racism, just because it seems ‘urgent’, ‘common-sense’, or ‘only for the really bad guys’.
I think he was never in this to win; he is just a cash cow for the DNC. To be honest, it doesn't seem like any of them are trying to win to me. So, idk.
I agree with him he's absolutely right and it's high time people start admitting these things out loud without fear or care of being called racist. The rest of us have to live here too and we are sick of the crimes being ignored, or even tolerated and encouraged because the R word is being held over everyone's head
Grood for you. Here’s an ordered list of what we care about:
-Every person’s God-given Natural Rights
-The Constitutional protections against infringing those rights
-Our President’s plan to lift minority communities out of Democrat-created Ghettos
-Republican Party Founder Abraham Lincoln’s emancipation proclamation
-Our moral duty to lend a hand to our fellow U.S. citizens, and all humanity
-Defeating toxic identity politics division
-Fixing issues stemming from systemic racism
-Fighting a small minority of ignorant bigots
-Correcting perceived racism
-Combatting media accusations of racism
-Argueing with idiots hurling slurs
-Your feelings
Placing those in ascending or descending order is an exercise left for the reader. MAGA
How is the first step act working out? Oh yeah they're just reoffending. Sorry man I used to believe everyone was equal we were ll just need to get along, the government policies are responsible for creating those situations etc etc. Then I grew up and saw white kids and black kids in the same neighborhoods with very similar upbringings in the home and similar culture around them, go totally different routes. And there's lots of research that explains why it is this way. Blacks on AVERAGE are different from whites on AVERAGE. There is so much evidence around. Crime stats are similar across country's all over the world because as a group blacks commit similar levels of crime in EVERY CITY under EVERY GOVERNMENT in EVERY COUNTRY. You want a great example? Look at Liberia, they copied our constitution almost word for word and tried to implement it. You know what happened? It turned into just another failed african country, just like rhodesia did when whites were driven out and blacks starved because they were too stupid to do what white farmers did. And yet, the blacks in south africa doing exactly what the rhodesians did, going after white farmers, don't seem to have learned a thing from it. Why? Because they are stupid that's why. When whites were painting works of art and building magnificent cathedrals what were Africans doing? The same thing they had been doing for thousands of years. Not building not inventing nor creating, just existing. You can make the argument that this is because whites had resources that Africans did not but im not inclined to believe it since whites improved the same areas when they traveled there far before industrialization. Africa is also lush with resources and always has been. Look man I'm not saying we can't be friends I'm not saying you aren't my fellow country man, I'm not saying you aren't an american, or anything like that. Im saying there are things that are true no matter how much we might want them not to be and that pretending these truths don't exist only harms us as a country. That's all.
Since you seem to be using evidence here, we can make a deal: format this eye strain into some paragraphs, and you’ll get a good-faith response.
Here's the deal, you can either read and reply (you already did but obviously don't know how to approach the facts I spelled out) on the stuff i brought up.. or you can act like a prissy little head up his own asshole faggot like you're doing right now. I don't really care either way because facts aren't changing anytime soon. If you want to understand why things are they way they actually are then that's a different matter but I don't think you do because you still clearly cling to the everyone is totally equal anyone who comes to america can be and act like an american in the spirit of the founders (even though the founders also already knew the basic truths about race... fun fact after freeing the slaves Lincoln wanted them sent back to africa.. I wish he would have)
Super Predators Hillary Clinton. Democrats are way more racist than Trump or his supporters.
An entire semester of HON350-‘Urban Planning & Governance’ could be spent untangling the causes and consequences of the unjust, unconstitutional, and faulty policy ideas wrapped within this single Bloomberg recording.
This guy ran one of the largest U.S. cities. He owns a giant media ‘news’ source that didn’t report this story, he’s financing gun-grabber groups around the country, and he’s basically leveraging a ‘buyout’ of an entire major U.S. political party.
Discussion topics might include: Broken Windows policing, Racial Profiling, State Agency Militarization, Government Paternalism, Policy-Created Ghettos, Political Hypocrisy, Evidence-based Policymaking, Community Policing, Abuse of Powers, Predictive Policing, Stop and Frisk, Gun Seizure Consequences, Corruption, Unequal justice, 4th Amendment, 2nd Amendment, Defensive gun use, Civil Rights protections, Due process, Enforcement bias, Identity Politics, Gang power enablement, Income divide, School to prison pipeline, Data analysis, Black-box enforcement algorithms, Algorithmic feedback loops, Media conglomeration, Reporters conflicts of Interest, Censorship