Violation of the 1st Amendment? There's proof of censorship with political bias. We know it's to influence the election. I don't understand why action hasn't been taken yet. Every time I ask about this no one answers the question. It would be one thing if Reddit's rules explicitly stated that conservative opinions are not allowed. Even in The_Donald we only allow posts that are supportive towards our president. But Reddit actively censors content and bans users for things that get no such actions in other subreddits. Why can't or hasn't there been a court case made of this? Are we waiting for the killing blow, when they delete The_Donald for good? If so, WHY are we waiting?
I know that Trump is aware of our community, and you'd think that there would've been steps taken to protect online conservative communities. But to my knowledge, there's been none. There's so much evidence right now that could be used in a legal case. It's actually surprising that Project Veritas hasn't gone inside Reddit yet. Can you imagine what they might find and if they brought it to light?
Anyways, can we actually do anything? At all?
Oh really? Then they're a publisher. And they're liable.
They/you can't have it both ways.
Ask yourself this. Can AT&T listen in on your landline phone calls and turn off your service if they don't like what you say? Can they do that?
If not, why not?
How is reddit different?
Once you answer those questions, then explain why reddit is allowed to have freedom from liability just like AT&T.
Personally, I believe Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, etc are publishers but they are currently treated as platforms. Why? I have no fucking idea.
Why is it that Stone can be brought to court, convicted, and sentenced while Barr, Sessions, Durham, et. al struggle to three years just to get a report out? I have no fucking idea.
Why is it that Antifa can mob bystanders and the police do nothing yet VA legislators are working day and night to remove constitutional rights from law abiding citizens? I have no fucking idea.
And the list continues and continues...
Wrong.
They can do whatever they like with their servers because they aren't a public utility and users agree to their terms.
Because the phone network is a public utility and Reddit is not a public utility.
Reddit's CEOs have First Amendment rights to be as biased as they like and they can run their servers how they like too... just like how Christian bakers can refuse to make sodomy cakes.
This is the law, even if it makes you sad.
The CEO has 1st Amendment rights but Reddit does not. The 1A does not specify it. Its property right.
Your claim has no basis in law.
You can't change the law by REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEing.