26
posted ago by SNRNXS ago by SNRNXS +26 / -0

Violation of the 1st Amendment? There's proof of censorship with political bias. We know it's to influence the election. I don't understand why action hasn't been taken yet. Every time I ask about this no one answers the question. It would be one thing if Reddit's rules explicitly stated that conservative opinions are not allowed. Even in The_Donald we only allow posts that are supportive towards our president. But Reddit actively censors content and bans users for things that get no such actions in other subreddits. Why can't or hasn't there been a court case made of this? Are we waiting for the killing blow, when they delete The_Donald for good? If so, WHY are we waiting?

I know that Trump is aware of our community, and you'd think that there would've been steps taken to protect online conservative communities. But to my knowledge, there's been none. There's so much evidence right now that could be used in a legal case. It's actually surprising that Project Veritas hasn't gone inside Reddit yet. Can you imagine what they might find and if they brought it to light?

Anyways, can we actually do anything? At all?

Comments (17)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
SpaceForceMilitia 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (a common name for Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a piece of Internet legislation. It provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an interactive computer service who publish information provided by others"

If this is revoked, as has been mentioned for some companies like Twitter etc, by some such as Barr, they will become liable for what others publish. Like a publisher, aka reality of now.

As long as they are allowed to pose as a public square, while acting as reddit acts towards us, your odds dont seem great. But I'm no lawyer.