Not quite the decision that was made here, apparently.
That would only make them liable for content, not necessarily prevent them from censoring. But that puts pressure on them not to censor in order to be considered a platform again.
Frankly, any platform that censors anything beyond what is actually illegal should be considered a publisher.
Not quite the decision that was made here, apparently.
That would only make them liable for content, not necessarily prevent them from censoring. But that puts pressure on them not to censor in order to be considered a platform again.
Frankly, any platform that censors anything beyond what is actually illegal should be considered a publisher.