Well I agree, it's not a public forum. It's a private Marxist shit hole that is protected under the 1st amendment to continue being a Marxist, Nazi, authoritarian, book burning wasteland.
PragerU took the wrong approach. Lawsuits should target the legal protections these shit companies enjoy via platform status. If they are going to selectively ban conservatives, then they are publishers that are legally liable for leftist calls to violence, terrorist organizing, and pedo porn.
The whole reason for being a platform is saying everyone can enjoy the service and if it's used criminally that's not the fault of the provider of the platform. But it changes once the platform starts selectively allowing some people over others to participate
Edit: they also falsely advertise by saying they are a platform and by saying their services are free. You trade all of your personal data for their services. Thats not free.
Well I agree, it's not a public forum. It's a private Marxist shit hole that is protected under the 1st amendment to continue being a Marxist, Nazi, authoritarian, book burning wasteland.
PragerU took the wrong approach. Lawsuits should target the legal protections these shit companies enjoy via platform status. If they are going to selectively ban conservatives, then they are publishers that are legally liable for leftist calls to violence, terrorist organizing, and pedo porn.
The whole reason for being a platform is saying everyone can enjoy the service and if it's used criminally that's not the fault of the provider of the platform. But it changes once the platform starts selectively allowing some people over others to participate
Edit: they also falsely advertise by saying they are a platform and by saying their services are free. You trade all of your personal data for their services. Thats not free.