The MSM always just dismisses Trump’s internet supporter’s energy as “racism” and “rage”, which is obvious bs. I always see tons of Trump memes and comments everywhere, and online his supporters are always the most passionate. Unfortunately, there aren't that many MAGA/KAG guys around in my area that I can talk to and discuss ideas with, and I also don’t have the time to spend all day browsing the forums online, so I’ve always been curious about what got other guys out there excited about Donald. I have a bunch of questions, feel free to answer whatever you want.
What do you think the best way to reason with a liberal friend/relative is? How do you know which media sources are real, and which are fake news? What do you guys think about Republicans like Mitch Mcconnel, Lindsey Graham, etc, those guys have been in congress a very long time, were they part of the deep state/swamp or were they always good guys? What exactly is the deep state? What gets you excited to talk about him online? How do you respond to liberals who don’t trust him? Before Donald made America great again, was America just ok, or was it bad for you? How much time do you think you spend online that is related to him? How much has YOUR life actually gotten better since he became POTUS? A little? A lot?
Thanks. 1- Just for a start, what news sources do you recommend? I'm not online a whole lot and most traditional news media is MSM. With media sources outside of MSM, its hard to confirm credibility. 2- As for source documents, how do you know which ones to trust? Photos and docs can easily be altered. The MSM pulled up photos of Trumps inauguration that had less people in it then the one that the WH released. In a case, like that, how can you tell for sure which one is real? 3- That makes sense. I feel like McConnell and Graham have never really had the peoples interest in mind. It bothers me a little that some swamp monsters are kinda getting off easy though.
Oann, whatfinger, the conservative treehouse, Breitbart seem to be solid. Breitbart gets click baity imo sometimes though. American Thinker isn't too bad either.
I’ll read any news source but it’s fairly easy to tell if it’s fake or not and usually there is another source to get another point of view on the same subject. I always look at how their article is sourced and what kind of bias their source may have. It’s easy to tell when the author starts injecting opinion over fact so that’s always considered also. Political source material that is on an official .gov website is ideal and video evidence is usually best. Photos like Trumps inauguration have many, many different shots and perspectives from official photos to photos from peoples social media that attended the event. Just takes a few extra steps to figure out is all. Unfortunately that’s the world we live in but it’s good practice anyway so long as you have the time