First, declare that Reddit (insert social media site here) is a Telephone Exchange and that you are a subscriber to the (Reddit) Exchange. Call on your AG to declare them to be operating as Telephone Exchanges in your state.
Well, I assume you aren't offering to pay them out of your own pocket, so that's one reason you might not be getting any traction. Lawyers like cases where they either get paid directly by the client, or they can see a larger payout sometime int the future. Class action cases are very high difficulty, drag on for years and they are very very high risk for the attorneys. Not many attorneys are going to take the kind of risk you would have to take to pursue the theories you put forward for purely economic reasons.
You have some very novel legal theories, you would have to break new legal ground to come up with a viable way for the complaint to survive a motion to dismiss.
I totally agree that there is a conflict between what the cia and nsa do and the fourth amendment, but I don't think you've developed it into something a lawyer could draft into a cognizable cause of action in a complaint.
I don't get your 5th amendment argument at all.
I don't think the system is rigged so much as your case may not be economically viable.
Speaking as an occasional class action attorney myself, the only viable theory I've heard for holding social media companies liable for discrimination against conservatives would be antitrust.
That's a lot to digest....But I don't know that its related to censorship of conservatives. Seems like anyone using social media, conservative or not, could make the same complaints, couldn't they?
First, declare that Reddit (insert social media site here) is a Telephone Exchange and that you are a subscriber to the (Reddit) Exchange. Call on your AG to declare them to be operating as Telephone Exchanges in your state.
Find a lawyer. Start there.
Well, I assume you aren't offering to pay them out of your own pocket, so that's one reason you might not be getting any traction. Lawyers like cases where they either get paid directly by the client, or they can see a larger payout sometime int the future. Class action cases are very high difficulty, drag on for years and they are very very high risk for the attorneys. Not many attorneys are going to take the kind of risk you would have to take to pursue the theories you put forward for purely economic reasons.
You have some very novel legal theories, you would have to break new legal ground to come up with a viable way for the complaint to survive a motion to dismiss.
I totally agree that there is a conflict between what the cia and nsa do and the fourth amendment, but I don't think you've developed it into something a lawyer could draft into a cognizable cause of action in a complaint.
I don't get your 5th amendment argument at all.
I don't think the system is rigged so much as your case may not be economically viable.
Speaking as an occasional class action attorney myself, the only viable theory I've heard for holding social media companies liable for discrimination against conservatives would be antitrust.
What are your 4th and 5th amendment theories?
That's a lot to digest....But I don't know that its related to censorship of conservatives. Seems like anyone using social media, conservative or not, could make the same complaints, couldn't they?