The entire scandal was fabricated start-to-finish to initiate Russiagate and the Mueller probe.
The DNC was never "hacked". The first Wikileaks drops originated from Podesta's personal Gmail account, which was hacked but had absolutely nothing to do with the DNC network. The second drop, per Julian Assange himself, came from someone inside the DNC (Seth Rich). The Russia narrative was created with the express purpose of conflating these two events and distracting from the content of the leaks.
Anyone following Wikileaks closely at the time saw it for exactly what it was: a coverup. As the information surfaced, the DNC lied and blamed Russian hackers, refused FBI assistance in investigating, then fabricated their own evidence based on an independent Crowdstrike "investigation" that never actually happened.
They have been making up quite a bit of shit if you haven't noticed. It's a bitter pill to swallow to realize that such deeply held 'sure' beliefs (like Muh Russia for a lot of folk) are entirely smoke and mirrors designed to engage in psychological warfare on an entire citizenry. People are not going to accept it.
William Binney from the NSA analyzed the Guccifer 2.0 documents and the wikileaks dump in its entirety. His findings resulted that it had to have been leaked via USB 2.0 Drive.
So now this means NOBODY checked the DNC server? So it was NEVER verified that Russians hacked anything or that there was even a hack at all?
The entire scandal was fabricated start-to-finish to initiate Russiagate and the Mueller probe.
The DNC was never "hacked". The first Wikileaks drops originated from Podesta's personal Gmail account, which was hacked but had absolutely nothing to do with the DNC network. The second drop, per Julian Assange himself, came from someone inside the DNC (Seth Rich). The Russia narrative was created with the express purpose of conflating these two events and distracting from the content of the leaks.
Anyone following Wikileaks closely at the time saw it for exactly what it was: a coverup. As the information surfaced, the DNC lied and blamed Russian hackers, refused FBI assistance in investigating, then fabricated their own evidence based on an independent Crowdstrike "investigation" that never actually happened.
William Binney Destroyed their narrative with their own findings albeit proving that the servers weren't hacked, but leaked. RIP SETH RICH.
it was john podesta coming up with the idea that russia did it in an interview on ccn about his emails on wikileaks.
You can smell the rubber burning as Romney throws that baby into reverse...
Nailed it.
HIS
NAME
WAS
Seth
RICH
Was
Seth
So who the hell did, then? Was it literally made up by WaPo?
They have been making up quite a bit of shit if you haven't noticed. It's a bitter pill to swallow to realize that such deeply held 'sure' beliefs (like Muh Russia for a lot of folk) are entirely smoke and mirrors designed to engage in psychological warfare on an entire citizenry. People are not going to accept it.
Was more than likely a manufactured hoax.
William Binney from the NSA analyzed the Guccifer 2.0 documents and the wikileaks dump in its entirety. His findings resulted that it had to have been leaked via USB 2.0 Drive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv0-Lnv0d0k
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
Im not really up to date on all the Hillary email stuff, what's so major about this?
They were supposedly hired to check the DNC's servers to see if it was hacked by Russians so the FBI didn't have to.
The literally only last link for muh Russia just imploded.
here it comes
Yeah, remember when they refused to testify about their “findings” before Congress?
Son of a bitch. This is huge. We've known this was a lie for years, to finally get it confirmed. I'm almost speechless.
Little late for that but ok....
So the FBI outsourced law enforcement to Crowdstrike, who now claims they didn't do anything? Based on this we had a 3 year hell for everyone?
Muh Lies Are Not Truth?
Is 2+2 still 5?