Why destroyed? They can do whatever they want in their countries.
Because they don't stay there, clearly. Though if you get rid of the (non-Muslim, non-American) groups pushing for importing them to the West, the problem would largely solve itself.
Islam cannot be contained -- the core objective of Islam is to convert the world, as long as there is one left, that one will seek to convert others or snack bar the world
If we could get to the point where your friendly neighborhood muslim doesn’t give a shit if you draw muhammed, and only doesn’t eat bacon cause it’s against HIS faith, i’d say they could come
The Dalai Lama is very logical and reasonable: Buddhism is all about detaching yourself from mortal distractions to come closer to nature's reality and/or spiritual nirvana. Buddhists believe in peaceful co-existence wherever possible, but they have fought bloody wars against Islam for centuries. They would be one of the last groups to go along with a "Politically Correct agenda" if it meant the complete subversion/destruction of an entire demographic of people.
Communist China has repeatedly tried to either kill the Dalai Lama, reincarnate him as one of their puppets, or bring him over to their "One China" propaganda. The Dalai Lama isn't about to go along quietly with the New World Order and become China's latest mouthpiece.
I think it's pretty unfair to call the Dalai Lama a globalist. He (and other Tibetan Buddhists) are pretty based. I mean they've been fighting for Tibet for Tibetans for a long while now. They also seem to understand that Islam is a dangerous, toxic ideology.
I think it's the reason why globalists have been using them for so long. They're the perfect "bad-guy". They can commit atrocious acts and then people still somehow feel bad for them!
The ideology of Islam reminds me of heroin addicts. Heroin addicts will lie, cheat, and steal to get what they want, but when caught they'll tell a sob story and people will feel bad for them.
Unpopular opinion here: I only feel bad for the minority of Muslims who actually want a reformation (similar to what Christianity had) and are overruled, ignored, and/or killed by the rest. I believe it would have happened in the 80's if it weren't for Globalists. And if it had actually happened, there actually might be peace in the Middle East today.
I love how they write he has a "surprising view". The WRITER has the suprising view. People do not want open borders. Fixing problems in the sending nation is the only resolution otherwise immigration will be used as a tool of offense for enemies. The government's simply send their least desirable. Castro did it under Carter. Dropped boat loads of undesirables on our shore during the mariel boat race. The left is oblivious to this. Where is the link?
This isn't surprising. The guy himself wants to return to Tibet. This is only surprising to people who don't bother learning why people become refugees in the first place.
Trying to debate these things with neolibs is a waste of time. As we sit on the internet, smugly pointing out their hypocrisy from our moral high-ground, they continue flooding our communities with interlopers. It's ridiculous how docile modern conservatives are.
Islam is not compatible with Western Civilization and no coexistence is possible.
Therefore, Islam must be destroyed.
Why destroyed? They can do whatever they want in their countries.
Islam must be send back.
Wrong. They will always keep trying. It needs to die.
We could say the same thing about communist, Poor refugees from Africa ecc.
Islam's endgame is world domination. Last I checked, it's a part of their eschatology.
Because they don't stay there, clearly. Though if you get rid of the (non-Muslim, non-American) groups pushing for importing them to the West, the problem would largely solve itself.
Deport kebab
I'd say contained, curtailed and kept beneath benevolent Western hegemony. Without an adversary, we'd become weaker.
Islam cannot be contained -- the core objective of Islam is to convert the world, as long as there is one left, that one will seek to convert others or snack bar the world
There would just be another religion/political ideology to replace it.
Or reformed.
If we could get to the point where your friendly neighborhood muslim doesn’t give a shit if you draw muhammed, and only doesn’t eat bacon cause it’s against HIS faith, i’d say they could come
After 1600 years of inbreeding, good luck dealing with that low-iq rage.
Isn't that a separate issue specific to the middle east? I know for a fact that pakistan has an inbreeding problem, but is it muslims as a whole?
We would never know due to their doctrines of deception and fake assimilation (until their numbers are sufficient to be open about their intentions).
Question presented: Will the Lefties now label the Dalai Llama as "Racist" and "Xenophobic?" Stay tuned!
Buddhist White Spremacist.
They probably already did
The article basically labeled him “controversial” and “political” in the last paragraph.
And also give them a bill for the education and training.
Build a wall?
They passed right by UAE, Saudi Arabia, and a half a dozen other Arabic countries. That's not what a refugee does.
Muslims don't like to take other muslims as refugees. They don't even like themselves!
The end of Islam's path is one of three things:
Complete obliteration of all other competing ideologies
Complete obliteration of itself
Complete reformation
Read the book "Camp of the Saints"
"WTF I hate the Dalai Lama now!"
What makes you call him a globalist I wonder? He has to choose statements carefully but I think he's pretty redpilled.
The title could have been worded better, but I think OP was referring to the Nobel Peace Prize as being globalist, not the Dalai Lama.
Note, dear reader, how the author of this piece undercuts the implicit authority of the Dalai Lama by highlighting his ability to have an opinion.
"...a reminder that while the Dalai Lama is nonChristian and nonWhite, he can still be ignored as a "racist," just like everyone else."
You have your orders, comrades!
The Dalai Lama is very logical and reasonable: Buddhism is all about detaching yourself from mortal distractions to come closer to nature's reality and/or spiritual nirvana. Buddhists believe in peaceful co-existence wherever possible, but they have fought bloody wars against Islam for centuries. They would be one of the last groups to go along with a "Politically Correct agenda" if it meant the complete subversion/destruction of an entire demographic of people.
Communist China has repeatedly tried to either kill the Dalai Lama, reincarnate him as one of their puppets, or bring him over to their "One China" propaganda. The Dalai Lama isn't about to go along quietly with the New World Order and become China's latest mouthpiece.
I think it's pretty unfair to call the Dalai Lama a globalist. He (and other Tibetan Buddhists) are pretty based. I mean they've been fighting for Tibet for Tibetans for a long while now. They also seem to understand that Islam is a dangerous, toxic ideology.
I think it's the reason why globalists have been using them for so long. They're the perfect "bad-guy". They can commit atrocious acts and then people still somehow feel bad for them!
The ideology of Islam reminds me of heroin addicts. Heroin addicts will lie, cheat, and steal to get what they want, but when caught they'll tell a sob story and people will feel bad for them.
Unpopular opinion here: I only feel bad for the minority of Muslims who actually want a reformation (similar to what Christianity had) and are overruled, ignored, and/or killed by the rest. I believe it would have happened in the 80's if it weren't for Globalists. And if it had actually happened, there actually might be peace in the Middle East today.
I love how they write he has a "surprising view". The WRITER has the suprising view. People do not want open borders. Fixing problems in the sending nation is the only resolution otherwise immigration will be used as a tool of offense for enemies. The government's simply send their least desirable. Castro did it under Carter. Dropped boat loads of undesirables on our shore during the mariel boat race. The left is oblivious to this. Where is the link?
He is an asian man . Which is just the next on the scale of "oppression" for NPCs.
Time for another crusade.
I wish Pope was half as smart. But he's busy satisfying his foot fetish, licking muslim migrant's feet.
How is it a conspiracy theory when you can just go outside in major European cities and see it with your own eyes?
Who would want to destabilize Democracy. Hmm
This isn't surprising. The guy himself wants to return to Tibet. This is only surprising to people who don't bother learning why people become refugees in the first place.
Having views based on logic and a firm understanding of history is now "surprising".
Merkel needs to be deported back to Syria.
"controversial viewpoint"
and once it becomes an islamic country there will be no diversity. we need to fight to diversify islamic countries.
We need to nuke Islamic countries.
Or at least get them back up to 1970's level of freedom.
Dude said this a year and a half ago.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/dalai-lama-europe-refugee-crisis-immigration-eu-racism-tibet-buddhist-a8537221.html
Opposing the whole of Europe becoming entirely Muslim or African is controversial? Sounds like this "journalist" wouldn't mind getting relocated.
It's sad when the Buddhist version of the Pope (the Dalai Lama) has more common sense then the actual Christian pope.
Trying to debate these things with neolibs is a waste of time. As we sit on the internet, smugly pointing out their hypocrisy from our moral high-ground, they continue flooding our communities with interlopers. It's ridiculous how docile modern conservatives are.
He is part of the “we“, homie.