The CDC is making a claim with nothing to back it up. Why would the CDC do that? What reasoning do they have to claim it when not even one study backs up the claim?
If they want to claim it, they should have done studies or at least say "we don't know yet, because we have no studies", right?
You really can't figure out why this may be a problem? That the CDC is lying and claiming something that isn't true about vaccines? You can't figure out how this may be a heath risk?
The risk of autism is far lower than having a population that isn’t immunized. The only reason we can build societies like we do are because of sanitation and immunization. If either one of those breaks down, society breaks down.
You really need to go visit Africa or something and see what happens in societies where immunization isn’t a matter of course. It’s devastating.
And you really need to become educated on the history of disease and vaccines instead of regurgitating the big corporate nonsense fed to you in elementary school.
I think the argument isn’t that children shouldn’t get vaccinated, but when. I tend to agree that maybe it would be worthwhile to delay vaccinations until after 6 months or 1 year.
That's because you can't prove a negative.
in this case, you can.
Not having done a single study means you can't say either way.
The CDC is making a claim with nothing to back it up. Why would the CDC do that? What reasoning do they have to claim it when not even one study backs up the claim?
If they want to claim it, they should have done studies or at least say "we don't know yet, because we have no studies", right?
In other words: WHY ARE THEY LYING?
This isn't reddit. This is The Donald.
they did study it. their initial data had statistically significant increase in autism rates amongst vaccinated blacks.
so, since they started-out not getting the data they wanted, they shut-down the project and hid the data.
came out in a FOIA a bit ago.
Treating thedonald.win like your personal Facebook feed? What’s next, promoting essential oils?
And? Or maybe the better question is; So?
You really can't figure out why this may be a problem? That the CDC is lying and claiming something that isn't true about vaccines? You can't figure out how this may be a heath risk?
The risk of autism is far lower than having a population that isn’t immunized. The only reason we can build societies like we do are because of sanitation and immunization. If either one of those breaks down, society breaks down.
You really need to go visit Africa or something and see what happens in societies where immunization isn’t a matter of course. It’s devastating.
And you really need to become educated on the history of disease and vaccines instead of regurgitating the big corporate nonsense fed to you in elementary school.
https://www.amazon.com/Dissolving-Illusions-Disease-Vaccines-Forgotten/dp/1480216895/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=vaccine+disease+history&qid=1583592405&sr=8-1
I think the argument isn’t that children shouldn’t get vaccinated, but when. I tend to agree that maybe it would be worthwhile to delay vaccinations until after 6 months or 1 year.