351
Comments (26)
sorted by:
13
TheAussie 13 points ago +13 / -0

So, what that means is a 17 year old could abuse an 8 year old and stay off the register. What a way to train 'em young!

11
LightBeacons [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Only if the 17 year old was a homosexual. Go figure!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
12
Cliffinati 12 points ago +12 / -0

California legalizing pedophilia for anyone under 28 pretty much

12
LightBeacons [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just for homosexual pedophilia. Let that sink in for a moment! Yikes.

7
Cliffinati 7 points ago +7 / -0

So most pedophilla

5
LightBeacons [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

only for LGBT pedos.

4
Cliffinati 4 points ago +4 / -0

So nearly all of them?

11
Schiffblower 11 points ago +11 / -0

So if they were 19 and the kid was 10, they’re off?

12
LightBeacons [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yep! There is a list with the math in the article for the 10 years older, which would be 20 years for 10 year old victim, so any homosexual rapist less than 20 years old is also a PASS for your example!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
10
Spez_Isacuck 10 points ago +10 / -0

Why are gay pedophiles afforded more privileges than straight pedophiles?

2
LightBeacons [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

only the Shadow knows

7
DontGiveUp 7 points ago +7 / -0

Spread this far and wide. Tell all. Show people what the dems are capable of. Many are still in the dark. Redpill the silent majority! Spread this on every social media site! Print out its contents and post it on public boards or wherever else you can! Contact child rights groups! Whatever you can think of, do it!

7
patriot51 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hey, thats just California being California.

7
ThickCheney 7 points ago +7 / -0

You guys forget that if a 20 year old male pedo rapes a little girl, he can just say he’s trans and he’ll be off the registry.

2
LightBeacons [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Noted! If this law passes, pedos will tell all kind of lies needed to get off that registry.

5
practicalize 5 points ago +5 / -0

I thought this headline was an exaggeration, but it’s pretty close to the bill’s own summary. WTF? I don’t see the specific reference to the homosexual-specific aspect in the bill, but it cited other laws that I didn’t cross-reference. The 10-year gap rape exception is really clear though. Very WTF.

EDIT: bill source

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Appeasement to Mexicans who commonly have very young girls as girlfriends.

5
inspir3dgenius 5 points ago +5 / -0

We're reaching levels of cuckery that shouldn't be possible!

4
Swellingsuperman 4 points ago +5 / -1

California is lost forever

3
PatriotForFreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Godless people

3
Shockrocks 3 points ago +3 / -0

What the actual fuck?

3
2016TrumpMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

So wait, 20 year old homo pedo rapes a little boy and he's not on the registry, but if a 20 year old hetero pedo rapes a little girl, he's on the registry? Just kill 'em all!

2
polish_snausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Next time.... just let it burn

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

How much worse can this state become?