Exactly man. People don't get this. Every company in existence is propped up and paid for by the customer. Every single salary, expense, and all overhead. Everything. Paid for by the customer. That CEO makes a lot of money? The customer paid him. Jeff Bezos super rich? The customer paid him.
Tax corporations? That means tax YOU, the customer.
This is why ALL successful companies are customer focused, first and foremost. The only place where you find shitty customer service are sectors which have a government enforced monopoly through over regulation (Utilities, Internet, Government itself, etc.)
If the government refuses to enforce the law and protect the safety, property, and rights of it's citizens, yet continues to tax them for these fundamental purposes, that government is nothing more than an occupying force.
Yeah man, it's not like "the worker" wouldn't exist or anything without these businesses. Jobs just spring up out of the aether.
Step 1: Business is created with seed money from owner, either from their own pockets or loans.
Step 2: Business hires workers to increase productivity.
Step 3: Business continues to exist due to sale of products produced by workers.
Step 4: Workers are paid out of revenue generated by sale of these products.
Now, if you simply steal the products a business makes, how do the workers get paid? Take from the corporate side? Steal from someone else because you were stolen from? That isn't going to last more than a few paychecks.
Y got the context of my statement muddled. I was replying to an op who implied that 'the poor' could collect income (i.e taxes) from 'the worker' by looting the business they work for. I disagree. They're not 'collecting' (i.e stealing) from the worker; but the 'work providers'. Anyway its Alice-in-Wonderland--the State decides it won't provide welfare; just let 'the poor' rob other people by de-criminalizing it. If enough of that occurs, of course, there won't be any 'businesses' or 'workers' (i.e employees)
Very creative. ..but these 'poor' are looting businesses; not robbing the worker.
Thank you!
Exactly man. People don't get this. Every company in existence is propped up and paid for by the customer. Every single salary, expense, and all overhead. Everything. Paid for by the customer. That CEO makes a lot of money? The customer paid him. Jeff Bezos super rich? The customer paid him. Tax corporations? That means tax YOU, the customer.
This is why ALL successful companies are customer focused, first and foremost. The only place where you find shitty customer service are sectors which have a government enforced monopoly through over regulation (Utilities, Internet, Government itself, etc.)
If the government refuses to enforce the law and protect the safety, property, and rights of it's citizens, yet continues to tax them for these fundamental purposes, that government is nothing more than an occupying force.
Yeah man, it's not like "the worker" wouldn't exist or anything without these businesses. Jobs just spring up out of the aether.
Step 1: Business is created with seed money from owner, either from their own pockets or loans.
Step 2: Business hires workers to increase productivity.
Step 3: Business continues to exist due to sale of products produced by workers.
Step 4: Workers are paid out of revenue generated by sale of these products.
Now, if you simply steal the products a business makes, how do the workers get paid? Take from the corporate side? Steal from someone else because you were stolen from? That isn't going to last more than a few paychecks.
Y got the context of my statement muddled. I was replying to an op who implied that 'the poor' could collect income (i.e taxes) from 'the worker' by looting the business they work for. I disagree. They're not 'collecting' (i.e stealing) from the worker; but the 'work providers'. Anyway its Alice-in-Wonderland--the State decides it won't provide welfare; just let 'the poor' rob other people by de-criminalizing it. If enough of that occurs, of course, there won't be any 'businesses' or 'workers' (i.e employees)