Y got the context of my statement muddled. I was replying to an op who implied that 'the poor' could collect income (i.e taxes) from 'the worker' by looting the business they work for. I disagree. They're not 'collecting' (i.e stealing) from the worker; but the 'work providers'. Anyway its Alice-in-Wonderland--the State decides it won't provide welfare; just let 'the poor' rob other people by de-criminalizing it. If enough of that occurs, of course, there won't be any 'businesses' or 'workers' (i.e employees)