posted ago by LibsOnSuicideWatch
+25 / -0
Simple suggestion: How about you guys set up the website so that it records exactly who upvotes and downvotes any given comment? It would tell you all exactly who the cucks downvoting are and allow you to ban them.
There's also still my sign up questionnaire as well.
Q: What year will Donald Trump exit the White House?
A: 2025.
Q: What is feminism?
A: Cancer.
Q: Fill in the blank: Rape culture does _____ exist.
A: not
Q: Fill in the blank: You _______ choose your gender.
A: cannot, can't, cant, can not
I know that any of this will take time to implement, but it would be a way to get rid of the cucks. On the other hand, signing up for an enemy campaign's website solely to downvote people is pathetic so maybe just let us laugh at them?
Why is karma so important?
And weren't we all pissed that Reddit banned us from upvoting? Why would we do the same thing for downvotes?
All they can do is downvote and cry because they cannot debate our facts.
Win should not be an echo chamber.
Karma isn't important, but this would allow the mods to locate and ban brigaders. And I think we already are an echo chamber. Most places that support any given candidate are echo chambers whether the users like it or not. We exist to promote pro-Trump content in the way r/JoeBiden (and reddit as a whole) exists to promote the DNC's chosen pawn. That's why it's a good idea to see what other websites say about politics to get a more diverse range of opinions than simply what your side is saying.
Also, banning the brigaders would be fun.
The reason we are good at debate is because we were never Twitter.
We have always had our ideas contested and our skills sharpened due to that. This is what makes us effective, we aren't coddled.
What you want is a "safe space" and i respectfully disagree with that.
I don't want a safe space at all. I'm just saying what it is.
So you are asking for downvotes to be banned for any reason.
But you don't want a safe space?
Ok so someone downvoted me, should they be banned?
The answer is no.
Not sure this questionnaire would be efficient. Even cucks know what answers we expect.
Intelligent move. I would suggest more questions. Like, for example:
Q: "Markets should be _____ for the best of the country."
A: "free", wrong answer would be "regulated".
Also, i would put the idea of a flair that is put on accounts when most of the questions are got wrong (but not enough to fail completely) that is visible to the rest of users while being unvisible for the user itself, shills would unveal locations and tricks after tricks while being marked for the whole time.