444 () posted 1 year ago by WeAreGonnaMAGA 1 year ago by WeAreGonnaMAGA +444 / -0 40 comments share 40 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (40) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 8 ▼ – PoohClimbsTrees 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0 Trains are not statistically dangerous. You just proved that yourself. Plus, those were deaths by stupidity not trains. Darwin killed them, the train did not attack them. permalink save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – Deleted 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0 Car accidents are higher. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – deleted 0 points 1 year ago +4 / -4 ▲ 4 ▼ – PoohClimbsTrees 4 points 1 year ago +5 / -1 So is the virus more, or less, aggressive than trains in attacking people? While you seem to have a train phobia and think they attack people, you do realize that viruses ACTUALLY attack people don't you? That was a pretty silly question. permalink parent save report block reply
Trains are not statistically dangerous. You just proved that yourself.
Plus, those were deaths by stupidity not trains. Darwin killed them, the train did not attack them.
Car accidents are higher.
While you seem to have a train phobia and think they attack people, you do realize that viruses ACTUALLY attack people don't you?
That was a pretty silly question.