20
Comments (8)
sorted by:
2
Stormysrectalseepage 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are proud of Trump and all his accomplisments. Always have been.

But we want Barr to arrest some motherfuckers. Some higher ups. When is that "happening" taking place?

1
COnDEMnED 1 point ago +1 / -0

In one of Trumps most recent rally, I think in Vegas,

“Lotta dirty cops in the FBI. Let’s see what happens in the next few months”

Or something to that affect.

2
Stormysrectalseepage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well tbh that doesn't give me faith something will happen. I don't trust Barr. He has done nothing to earn the trust so far.

0
bakerlevi [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

"These things take time" - Bill Barr

Having fun yet?

The 'muh arrests' narrative died long ago, why keep trotting it out?

Do you trust POTUS? Military CoC? Choices of roles within the admin?

2
Stormysrectalseepage 2 points ago +2 / -0

"These things take time" .....im sure Roger Stone isnt having fun in prison while McCabe and Comey walk free.

What "muh arrests" narrative? So are you saying we arent going to see justice from this? That's bullshit.

Because people like Greg Jarrett have been walking back indictments happening recently and been pretty "eh" on justice for the traitors (Brennan, Comey, McCabe, etc) happening.....

you Q folks don't get to walk that back. Sorry. You have to own it if nobody is brought to justice by Barr and Co.

But then again many of you thought Sessions was a "good guy" when even POTUS called him out for being a snake and caving to the Mueller probe and won't endorse him for a Senate run.

0
bakerlevi [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

"These things take time" .....im sure Roger Stone isnt having fun in prison while McCabe and Comey walk free.

I'm sure their feelings are less important than SUCCESSFULLY taking down a world criminal syndicate of pedophile Satan worshipers.

What "muh arrests" narrative?

The narrative YOU JUST TYPED IN YOUR FIRST SENTENCE. That today only, the range of arrests and not arrested must be the psychological basis, that's why you wrote it first.

Then, you feign ignorance.

So are you saying we arent going to see justice from this? That's bullshit.

Why ask the question of what I meant and then answer what only I can give answer to, as if what you're saying is what I am saying despite what I actually think?

Because people like Greg Jarrett have been walking back indictments happening recently

You sound like a fake news pundit.

"Walking back".

Subjective feelings/mind reading.

Oh you poor thing.

IT'S A TIDAL WAVE COMING AT YOUR SCRIPT MASTERS.

Over 147,000 sealed court cases and indictments!

Historical average at any one time was 1000.

Now you have some trouble with math like that ditz on the equally ditz Brian Williams show where she said $500 million divided by 360 million people is $1 million per person, but the math with the SEALED (do you know what sealed means? It means charges were made, AND it is also true that you don't know who was charged or what they were charged for) court cases and indictments suggests that a gigantic criminal enterprise take down is taking place. You can't tell me that the average American citizen has become 147 times more a law breaker than their former selves just a few years ago.

WE WERE BRAINWASHED BY A FAKE DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN SINCE BIRTH.

Been been pretty "eh" on justice for the traitors (Brennan, Comey, McCabe, etc) happening.....

YOUR timeline is not the standard timeline.

you Q folks don't get to walk that back. Sorry. You have to own it if nobody is brought to justice by Barr and Co.

You're falsely presuming that THE timeline imposed on "us" is YOUR personal subjective timeline and all of the references that you are describing it with.

And, then judging what you're judging as valid or not valid in the ontological reality surrounding you sense.

Oh noooo, you don't fool me one bit.

I never committed to the arrests of the people you mentioned by 'today'.

There is no reason for me to believe I have to 'explain' or that I am living in a reality you say I am living in and 'can't walk back from'.

YOU need to respond to the Q proofs.

But then again many of you thought Sessions was a "good guy" when even POTUS called him out for being a snake and caving to the Mueller probe and won't endorse him for a Senate run.

Oh you poor thing. They are ACTING.

Q wrote about what they would do way back in Nov 2017.

I've known it to be an act before you even knew who Q was, and here you are attacking a 'larp'.

Hahaha, your attacks are our energy and validation. We don't get affected by gaslighting code.

Because people like Greg Jarrett have been walking back indictments happening recently and been pretty "eh" on justice for the traitors (Brennan, Comey, McCabe, etc) happening.....

you Q folks don't get to walk that back. Sorry. You have to own it if nobody is brought to justice by Barr and Co.

But then again many of you thought Sessions was a "good guy" when even POTUS called him out for being a snake and caving to the Mueller probe and won't endorse him for a Senate run.

1
Stormysrectalseepage 1 point ago +2 / -1

WHAT HAS Q PROVED?

Name several things Q has proved. Concrete things that he has proved. You are holding out hope for MUH SEALED INDICTMENTS...

YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THOSE SEALED INDICTMENTS ARE FOR. Nobody does.

LOL now you are trying to say that it's all MUH 4D CHESS between Sessions and Trump....

You realize that Trump bad mouthing Sessions via Twitter could cost him the senate race?? People want who the President endorses. That would be stupid to bad mouth him as "acting" would it not??

I don't care how long youve followed Q. There are others who followed him from the beginning and stopped because they said it was fake and bullshit.

I'm the one living in reality. You are living in the land of what some person named Q behind a keyboard is saying to you.

Id trust Gregg Jarretts sources (who wrote a book on the Russia hoax that was 100 percent accurate) over some Q bullshit which is vauge, ominous and can be spun any way somebody sees fit.

If Barr steps down, will you claim that is part of the plan as well?

0
bakerlevi [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Q HAS PROVED ITSELF REAL, http://qanon.pub

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/6156082.html

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/7371448.html


https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1236778368533700609

https://twitter.com/Western2A/status/1236802011468828678

We've been expecting your meltdown, panicbot.

Name several things Q has proved. Concrete things that he has proved.

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/6156082.html

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/7371448.html

You are holding out hope for MUH SEALED INDICTMENTS...

YOU SOUND SCARED.

You're pushing the same 'muh arrest' script since 4chan 2017.

Your timeline is not the correct timeline.

All of your hysteria doesn't work on anyone.

YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THOSE SEALED INDICTMENTS ARE FOR. Nobody does.

Pretty sure the people SEALING them (prosecuted by the Executive branch) knows what's in them.

Jeffrey Epstein's indictment was from an investigation overseen and directed by Jeff Sessions and neither you nor your script masters knew about it for many months until it became 'public'.

Epstein's unsealing was both a warm up to prep the public AND to bait the deep state into using up more ammo trying to distract/deflect/cover up everyone connected to his 'Lolita Express' to that Satanic ritual island.

Did you think you'd hear about it first?. Who are you again?

LOL now you are trying to say that it's all MUH 4D CHESS between Sessions and Trump....

LOL, "now", as if I just came up with that 'defense' in some sort of hasty reaction to what you have been vomiting all over this site.

No not "now". Tons of people have known about it since at least Nov 2017.

"What show is being put on by AG Sessions since his confirmation?" Q151, Nov 14, 2017

"What show is being put on by POTUS since AG Sessions’ confirmation?" Q151, Nov 14, 2017

You realize that Trump bad mouthing Sessions via Twitter could cost him the senate race?? People want who the President endorses. That would be stupid to bad mouth him as "acting" would it not??

Nice try you stupid gaslighter. It DOES NOT FOLLOW from identifying Trump and Sessions to be ACTING that this is 'bad mouthing them'.

You write as if you can mind read.

You're a bot.

I don't care how long youve followed Q.

I don't care how long you have been shitting your pants over Q.

There are others who followed him from the beginning and stopped because they said it was fake and bullshit.

Hahahaha, there are people who used to follow you then they realized you're full shit.

I'm the one living in reality.

Nah, you're living in a fake news panic script mess of a failure to control the narrative, panicbot.

You are living in the land of what some person named Q behind a keyboard is saying to you.

You're projecting your own activity of posting shillscripts on this site.

Id trust Gregg Jarretts sources (who wrote a book on the Russia hoax that was 100 percent accurate) over some Q bullshit which is vauge, ominous and can be spun any way somebody sees fit.

Q was writing about the Russia hoax before you even knew who Q was.

TRY HARDER SCRIPT BOT.

If Barr steps down, will you claim that is part of the plan as well?

lOoK aT mY hYpOtHeTiCaL iF tHeN dEfLeCtIoN tHaT iS rEaLlY mY hOpE.