This is just unconscionable. Daily Mail is a cancer. Someone here suggested it to me as a news site a while ago but they should get their head examined.
DM is or WAS good for a couple of reasons. They have more of the facts, without trying to sway the agenda, than any other news outlet, and they have them first. Even if it is a US breaking story, they have the info before the US does, it seems. I dont read it much anymore, because they were conservative, but got biased in past few years, to say or insinuate untrue, uncalled for things in their articles about the President, but they do still have the actual facts, long articles, photos, before anyone else. If you compare their article on an incident to one from CNN, you will see the obvious difference and total lack of substance from CNN. Too bad they allowed themselves to be manipulated.
This is just unconscionable. Daily Mail is a cancer. Someone here suggested it to me as a news site a while ago but they should get their head examined.
DM is or WAS good for a couple of reasons. They have more of the facts, without trying to sway the agenda, than any other news outlet, and they have them first. Even if it is a US breaking story, they have the info before the US does, it seems. I dont read it much anymore, because they were conservative, but got biased in past few years, to say or insinuate untrue, uncalled for things in their articles about the President, but they do still have the actual facts, long articles, photos, before anyone else. If you compare their article on an incident to one from CNN, you will see the obvious difference and total lack of substance from CNN. Too bad they allowed themselves to be manipulated.