IF the government "changes the rules" via quarantine, closing of facilities, placing new restrictions on public gatherings, etc, it is a valid question and concern of are they (we), the government responsible in whole or in part for costs incurred. If 5000 people need to be quarantined, it's an inconvenience, but barely a blip. If 500,000 need to be quarantined, then it becomes a much larger issue. And, last I checked the fifth amendment's "liberty" allows us to travel where we damn well please, and is not overridden by quarantine. (Of course we, as a nation will enforce quarantine protocols upon ourselves).
IF the government "changes the rules" via quarantine, closing of facilities, placing new restrictions on public gatherings, etc, it is a valid question and concern of are they (we), the government responsible in whole or in part for costs incurred. If 5000 people need to be quarantined, it's an inconvenience, but barely a blip. If 500,000 need to be quarantined, then it becomes a much larger issue. And, last I checked the fifth amendment's "liberty" allows us to travel where we damn well please, and is not overridden by quarantine. (Of course we, as a nation will enforce quarantine protocols upon ourselves).