I've been refraining from making any solid assessment on the virus because the information has been so sporadic, untrustworthy, and relatively non-informative up to this point. However, I think I've collected enough data points at this stage to say there's a good chance this whole thing is manufactured hysteria in order to tank the market before the election, because there's a 0% chance Trump loses with a market as strong as it was (and only getting stronger).
Disclaimer: I'm not saying the virus is fake. My best guess is that it's been around and in circulation for a long time, years probably, and the reason it looks like it's 'spreading' now is because the testing just started. You'll notice that countries who start testing en mass find the virus en mass, whereas those that don't...well...you get the picture.
Mass panic causes hospitals / medical industry to get overwhelmed, which makes anyone needing attention get less, and causes deaths in and of itself.
I'm going to lay out some data points, but first indulge me as I briefly explain my theory of "Which Facts Matter Most?" There are far too many facts in the world, and most of them are not relevant. Very often people base their studies/investigations/opinions on the facts that don't matter. You see, while facts are indisputable, there are often many valid ways to interpret a single fact, especially if you aren't close to the situation, because you will have far less details about it than those who are (details serve to rule out many otherwise plausible interpretations).
So what can we do to try and decipher the truth of things in a world of fake news? Look for the facts that matter most: the facts with only one or two valid interpretations.
An example I like to give is from Hillary Clinton's emails, where longtime government official Lewis Amselem writes:
"W ith fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch . .
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06131616 Date: 11/03/2016"
Which was received by Hillary's staff and herself as, apparently, normal conversational wording.
The lucky rabbit's foot? Sure. The sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch? Not so much...yes, the guy is joking, but who tells a joke like that? It's not exactly a commonly known pagan god, certainly not before PizzaGate, and while Christians might know about Moloch from the Bible, they certainly wouldn't be joking about sacrificing chickens in the back yard to him.
The list of reasonable explanations for this fact consists of, basically, 1 item: Moloch is a common reference among private elite circles, but they don't do it in public.
What does that mean? By itself, not much, but it's an important data point because it establishes 100% (because there's only 1 plausible explanation for this fact) that elites have very different conversations behind our backs than us normal folk would expect, and we probably wouldn't be happy to find out about what kind of content they consist of, which is why they keep it behind our backs.
So, what are some of the key data points in the COVID-19 scare?
-
NBA player Gobert is the first player diagnosed with virus, after making fun of it on video by touching microphones, etc...
-
Tom Hanks is also diagnosed, receives cute Wilson look-alike from hospital staff to keep him company while in quarantine
-
Enimem also diagnosed
-
Universities are first collective organizations shutting down over virus fears, many have 0 diagnosed cases yet
-
China 'owned' NBA first sports organization to shut down
-
Trump states on multiple occasions "it's going to vanish" or "it's going to go away"
-
Trump bans flights pretty early from China, then Europe (but not UK)
-
COVID-19 is medically categorized as almost benign to all but at-risk elderly
Why are these data points the most important? Because they have few valid interpretations if the pandemic is totally organic and unmanipulated. The numbers are so low, even in countries where it's 'taking over', that for people like Tom Hanks or Enimem to contract is highly unlikely, especially if it hasn't been circulating everywhere for a long time now. Then you have the staged 'Wilson' element added in - the only other exlpanation is that the hospital staff had an off the cuff really cute and funny idea to play around with Tom Hanks in the middle of a super stressful global pandemic...
The NBA player mocking the virus on video is the first to be confirmed to have it. Very coincidental, seems more like a slap on the wrist than organic.
If the virus is a real threat, Trump has no reason to make statements like "it's going to go away", in fact, it's unbearably stupid to do so, and we know he isn't that.
Banning entry from Europe but NOT UK is odd, then you consider UK is doing Brexit and Trump won't want to hurt them economically, it seems like a political move more than a viral response. This interview helps to confirm that as an element:
https://www.pscp.tv/w/1ypKdQnRVLdGW
[Paraphrase] Reporter: "European leaders are mad you did this without consulting them first" Trump: "Well, they don't consult me when they raise tariffs on american goods, so same thing here" [/Paraphrase]
So, what then? Trump has to take the threat seriously no matter if the virus is a true pandemic because it is an attack on his economy, and an attack on the medical system. When people panic over even a fake pandemic, the medical system will become overwhelmed, and seem to confirm the pandemic, especially because media can report on only the stressed areas and make it seem really bad. In particular, if elites wanted to manufacture a pandemic, claiming at-risk elderly are almost the only victims is very safe, because when medical systems become overloaded you're going to see those death numbers rise significantly, virus or no virus. Is there some other scientific reason that it has almost no effect on the young? Seems unlikely, as the flu pretty much affects everyone in the same way regardless of age.
What am I saying? I'm saying right now, my best assessment of this situation is that COVID-19 has been circulating in the world population for years now, likely planted there, it's not very dangerous from a health standpoint (considering we haven't even noticed), and it was chosen by elites to be the featured virus of a pandemic to purposefully spike the economy before the election. China begins the pandemic scare because they have full autonomy over their public & health response systems, and can stage a mass crisis very easily. NBA follows suit. Universities do as well. The positive tests are, of course, most likely real, but if everyone in the world was magically tested right now, we'd probably find it's everywhere, has been for quite some time, and nobody has noticed.
Keep in mind there are real dangers here. Pandemic panic WILL overflow medical facilities, which WILL result in at-risk elderly people who need care dying at much higher rates. It will also, as we have seen, tank the markets, and because Globalists have control of much of world manufacturing, production, and trade, they can shut those things down 'in response' at will to help kill the economy...but they needed an excuse to do so.
Because Trump is guaranteed to win 2020 in a super-strong economy.
(My name is Christopher Hill, I am the lead programmer and co-owner of Three Guys Game Studio, have a beautiful wife and 2 daughters, and am forever in awe of Donald John Trump's speech at the Al Smith dinner)
*Edit: This explanation would also explain China's taper off of the 'spread', as once you start testing you're going to see cases grow like crazy, correlated with the amount of testing, and once you've diagnosed the cases that were already there, it will basically flat line. Expect this same flat line everywhere after the initial spike after testing ramps up.
This would also explain why Trump is saying it will go away, and trying to do as little testing here as possible. The testing is what triggers the pandemic (because the virus is already here and it's fine). The two choices are: a) don't test, let it fizzle or b) test and have a mini-pandemic as the numbers of cases seem to rise exponentially until eventually tapering off because everyone has been tested now.
That's interesting.
I've been in and out of weird flu-like symptoms for two years now. Right around Oct/Nov, it feels like I'm about to come down with a bad case of the flu. Headaches. Very slight chills now and then. Fatigue. Sore throat. Then it lingers on without developing into full blown symptoms. Then it goes away a few weeks later. Then it comes back a month later, but not as pronounced. Then again, about a month later. Then in the summer it almost completely goes away. Then it came back stronger again like it was last year this November. In fact, before this pandemic, I was about to go into the doctor and see if he could figure this out. So, I'm definitely open to the idea that some new virus has been floating around for a while now. It's nothing like I've ever experienced.
Also, I'm in So Cal. We've had no community spread outbreak, that I know of. Our diagnosed cases are all from people coming in from somewhere else. Maybe that's because it has been here for a while.
The trigger for the "pandemic" is actually the testing, not the release of the virus. Heh. That does sound like some spook shit, doesn't it?
And given what we know now, was not the Chinese reaction utterly and completely overblown? Just the video coming out from China made the whole world freak out, including me. How many times did you hear, "Judging from the reaction in China, it must be a killer virus!" "They wouldn't respond that way, if it wasn't really serious!" Well, maybe that was staged to freak the world out.
After all, without that kind of drama, we'd all just regard it like H1N1 or any of the other big flu outbreaks. Life would pretty much go on as usual.
Welp. I'll go in for a test soon. If it comes back pos for the Wuhan China virus, that would cinch your idea here, I think, because I've had these minor flu-like symptoms off and on for two years.
Let me know how it turns out if you can get a test!
This seems like a reasonable view on things, with a lot of details I hadn't thought about before. Quality post, my guy.
The absolute state of the economy right now seems like a premeditated sell off among the hedge funds. Working backwards from that can lead to the same conclusion.
Interesting analysis.
I think it's odd that Seattle was "fine" until over 20 elders died in a home. Perhaps this forced them to admit it when test were done?
A gas station clerk told me he saw people complaining of the weirdest flu/cold back in November. They couldn't shake it. But I haven't heard claim of years earlier.
What I do like about your theory is that it accounts for a handful of muckity mucks having it -- or claiming to for purposes of fear spreading.
I'm still naive enough to not believe that there is a 10,000 person world order led from DC and Hollywood, plus other country leaders that get together and coordinate the collapse of the free world.
What I could believe is that this has been around before November even, but that it got to America about then. It was just an irritating cold for everyone until the old folks home requires them to look deeper into the cause. Once that happened, hysteria broke out that it was deadly and the testing from there showed just how wide spread it had become. As for the deaths, that happens with every flu. But like Shark Week, once you shine a light on it, people go ape shit.
They were looking for a reason to try their new world shut down strategy at least as far back as October. https://youtu.be/AoLw-Q8X174
Repost this during the day for more upvotes.
There are plans on top of plans on top of plans. What better way to eliminate defiant personality types, institute far greater government controls, and drive the entire world further into debt based fiat currency schemes, than with a pandemic scare which actually does kill in large numbers.
You make salient points regarding dialectic (my words) crisis manipulation and statistical aberrations, but whatever it’s progenitor the Wuflu S and L mutations are recent, temporarily more dangerous adaptations.
Virus’s have evolved in our presence for all of human existence, periodically affecting our health, yet we survive and thrive. I agree, this too shall pass.
Protect the elderly and infirmed, keep fit, eat well and don’t allow the unbalanced herd to derail logical behaviour.
If anything, aren't recent mutations a sign it's been around and incubating for a while? How many influenza mutations are there per year?
COVID-19 has 29891 nucleotides, whereas influenza only has ~13500, and smaller genomes mutate faster than larger ones...if we're only a few months into COVID-19 incubation, mutations seem rather unlikely at this stage, no?
Then again, no clue wtf I am talking about.
Sounds right to me.....Btw your theory is further supported by the diving mortality rate in Sth Korea due to wholesale testing identifying more widespread, but relatively benign infection.
‘Cui Bono’......China was being smashed by Trumps trade fight back, the HK issue and internal division. A clamp down and distraction was required and the Wuflu was the justification. Others who are profiting politically (like the Dems) from this game have seized an opportunity and gone along for the ride.
Keep up the good work TGGS 👍
View is reasonable. I would add some information:
" Banning entry from Europe but NOT UK is odd, then you consider UK is doing Brexit and Trump won't want to hurt them economically, it seems like a political move more than a viral response. "
This move makes sense to me. The EU is STILL trying to force all of Europe into an open-border policy, and northern Italy is boiling over with a more virulent strain of cases due to a continuing, close physical connection to Wuhan, including direct flights. China has bought up a bunch of factories, and shipped in about 100K people to work in them, in Italy.
UK has probably quietly agreed to control their own borders. And, they can.
Yeah right but it doesn't explains why we've seen these troubling videos from China, why china is was in lockdown for a month, why now Italy is in lockdown.
Since you're building a conspiracy theory you can use the four cases of plague in Inner Mongolia last November at the same time there was a rat infestation (they put checkpoints and used rat poison to kill them but the population was out of control) and the avian flu (birds can carry the disease so if you want to kill them just say they have the avian flu),
The pneumonic plague has the same symptoms as Covid19 at first, but you always die without treatment you need antibiotics in the first 24h after the first symptom onsets to have a 30% chance of survival.
It would explained why we've seen people liquefied in the street of Wuhan, why they screamed in these building, why they are barring people in their home, why they are burning people still alive, why they are using disinfectant truck in areas where no pedestrians can go…
A few things you should understand:
Video coming out of China can as easily be manipulated or deceptive as real. Point being, Chinese people screaming as government police take them from their homes is probably something that happens every single day in China for lots of reasons. And, as I said, when medical systems get overwhelmed, people die, and mass pandemic panic is a sure way to overload those systems.
Italy shutting down due to their medical system being overwhelmed all falls well within the realm of my explanation as well as a 'real pandemic' explanation. This fact has multiple viable interpretations, and is therefore less relevant than others.
Basically, you're focusing on the wrong facts because they have valid explanations that fall within my suggestion as well as the official one. You need to find facts that can't be explained in any other way than 'real pandemic'.
"internet accused"
Now there's overwhelming evidence of guilt.
Not at all, merely relevant data points when considering whether or why 2 high-profile individuals might go along with a fake scare.
Not relevant at all..
Ok, generically this is true, I just didn't want to go into the specific evidences of their pedophilia. There are many internet accusations that are irrelevant. In my opinion, the accusations against those two individuals are relevant.
In terms of Enimem, look into his relationship with Rachel (Ray) Chandler.
In terms of Hanks, he has quite a few victim accusers.
I didn't look too long, but I only noticed one Hanks accuser, and it may as well be Christine Blasey Ford for all the faith I put into her statements. As for Eminem, I don't care about him and doubt very many folks do.