I've been refraining from making any solid assessment on the virus because the information has been so sporadic, untrustworthy, and relatively non-informative up to this point. However, I think I've collected enough data points at this stage to say there's a good chance this whole thing is manufactured hysteria in order to tank the market before the election, because there's a 0% chance Trump loses with a market as strong as it was (and only getting stronger).
Disclaimer: I'm not saying the virus is fake. My best guess is that it's been around and in circulation for a long time, years probably, and the reason it looks like it's 'spreading' now is because the testing just started. You'll notice that countries who start testing en mass find the virus en mass, whereas those that don't...well...you get the picture.
Mass panic causes hospitals / medical industry to get overwhelmed, which makes anyone needing attention get less, and causes deaths in and of itself.
I'm going to lay out some data points, but first indulge me as I briefly explain my theory of "Which Facts Matter Most?" There are far too many facts in the world, and most of them are not relevant. Very often people base their studies/investigations/opinions on the facts that don't matter. You see, while facts are indisputable, there are often many valid ways to interpret a single fact, especially if you aren't close to the situation, because you will have far less details about it than those who are (details serve to rule out many otherwise plausible interpretations).
So what can we do to try and decipher the truth of things in a world of fake news? Look for the facts that matter most: the facts with only one or two valid interpretations.
An example I like to give is from Hillary Clinton's emails, where longtime government official Lewis Amselem writes:
"W ith fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch . .
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2016-07895 Doc No. C06131616 Date: 11/03/2016"
Which was received by Hillary's staff and herself as, apparently, normal conversational wording.
The lucky rabbit's foot? Sure. The sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch? Not so much...yes, the guy is joking, but who tells a joke like that? It's not exactly a commonly known pagan god, certainly not before PizzaGate, and while Christians might know about Moloch from the Bible, they certainly wouldn't be joking about sacrificing chickens in the back yard to him.
The list of reasonable explanations for this fact consists of, basically, 1 item: Moloch is a common reference among private elite circles, but they don't do it in public.
What does that mean? By itself, not much, but it's an important data point because it establishes 100% (because there's only 1 plausible explanation for this fact) that elites have very different conversations behind our backs than us normal folk would expect, and we probably wouldn't be happy to find out about what kind of content they consist of, which is why they keep it behind our backs.
So, what are some of the key data points in the COVID-19 scare?
-
NBA player Gobert is the first player diagnosed with virus, after making fun of it on video by touching microphones, etc...
-
Tom Hanks is also diagnosed, receives cute Wilson look-alike from hospital staff to keep him company while in quarantine
-
Enimem also diagnosed
-
Universities are first collective organizations shutting down over virus fears, many have 0 diagnosed cases yet
-
China 'owned' NBA first sports organization to shut down
-
Trump states on multiple occasions "it's going to vanish" or "it's going to go away"
-
Trump bans flights pretty early from China, then Europe (but not UK)
-
COVID-19 is medically categorized as almost benign to all but at-risk elderly
Why are these data points the most important? Because they have few valid interpretations if the pandemic is totally organic and unmanipulated. The numbers are so low, even in countries where it's 'taking over', that for people like Tom Hanks or Enimem to contract is highly unlikely, especially if it hasn't been circulating everywhere for a long time now. Then you have the staged 'Wilson' element added in - the only other exlpanation is that the hospital staff had an off the cuff really cute and funny idea to play around with Tom Hanks in the middle of a super stressful global pandemic...
The NBA player mocking the virus on video is the first to be confirmed to have it. Very coincidental, seems more like a slap on the wrist than organic.
If the virus is a real threat, Trump has no reason to make statements like "it's going to go away", in fact, it's unbearably stupid to do so, and we know he isn't that.
Banning entry from Europe but NOT UK is odd, then you consider UK is doing Brexit and Trump won't want to hurt them economically, it seems like a political move more than a viral response. This interview helps to confirm that as an element:
https://www.pscp.tv/w/1ypKdQnRVLdGW
[Paraphrase] Reporter: "European leaders are mad you did this without consulting them first" Trump: "Well, they don't consult me when they raise tariffs on american goods, so same thing here" [/Paraphrase]
So, what then? Trump has to take the threat seriously no matter if the virus is a true pandemic because it is an attack on his economy, and an attack on the medical system. When people panic over even a fake pandemic, the medical system will become overwhelmed, and seem to confirm the pandemic, especially because media can report on only the stressed areas and make it seem really bad. In particular, if elites wanted to manufacture a pandemic, claiming at-risk elderly are almost the only victims is very safe, because when medical systems become overloaded you're going to see those death numbers rise significantly, virus or no virus. Is there some other scientific reason that it has almost no effect on the young? Seems unlikely, as the flu pretty much affects everyone in the same way regardless of age.
What am I saying? I'm saying right now, my best assessment of this situation is that COVID-19 has been circulating in the world population for years now, likely planted there, it's not very dangerous from a health standpoint (considering we haven't even noticed), and it was chosen by elites to be the featured virus of a pandemic to purposefully spike the economy before the election. China begins the pandemic scare because they have full autonomy over their public & health response systems, and can stage a mass crisis very easily. NBA follows suit. Universities do as well. The positive tests are, of course, most likely real, but if everyone in the world was magically tested right now, we'd probably find it's everywhere, has been for quite some time, and nobody has noticed.
Keep in mind there are real dangers here. Pandemic panic WILL overflow medical facilities, which WILL result in at-risk elderly people who need care dying at much higher rates. It will also, as we have seen, tank the markets, and because Globalists have control of much of world manufacturing, production, and trade, they can shut those things down 'in response' at will to help kill the economy...but they needed an excuse to do so.
Because Trump is guaranteed to win 2020 in a super-strong economy.
(My name is Christopher Hill, I am the lead programmer and co-owner of Three Guys Game Studio, have a beautiful wife and 2 daughters, and am forever in awe of Donald John Trump's speech at the Al Smith dinner)
*Edit: This explanation would also explain China's taper off of the 'spread', as once you start testing you're going to see cases grow like crazy, correlated with the amount of testing, and once you've diagnosed the cases that were already there, it will basically flat line. Expect this same flat line everywhere after the initial spike after testing ramps up.
This would also explain why Trump is saying it will go away, and trying to do as little testing here as possible. The testing is what triggers the pandemic (because the virus is already here and it's fine). The two choices are: a) don't test, let it fizzle or b) test and have a mini-pandemic as the numbers of cases seem to rise exponentially until eventually tapering off because everyone has been tested now.
Yeah right but it doesn't explains why we've seen these troubling videos from China, why china is was in lockdown for a month, why now Italy is in lockdown.
Since you're building a conspiracy theory you can use the four cases of plague in Inner Mongolia last November at the same time there was a rat infestation (they put checkpoints and used rat poison to kill them but the population was out of control) and the avian flu (birds can carry the disease so if you want to kill them just say they have the avian flu),
The pneumonic plague has the same symptoms as Covid19 at first, but you always die without treatment you need antibiotics in the first 24h after the first symptom onsets to have a 30% chance of survival.
It would explained why we've seen people liquefied in the street of Wuhan, why they screamed in these building, why they are barring people in their home, why they are burning people still alive, why they are using disinfectant truck in areas where no pedestrians can go…
A few things you should understand:
Video coming out of China can as easily be manipulated or deceptive as real. Point being, Chinese people screaming as government police take them from their homes is probably something that happens every single day in China for lots of reasons. And, as I said, when medical systems get overwhelmed, people die, and mass pandemic panic is a sure way to overload those systems.
Italy shutting down due to their medical system being overwhelmed all falls well within the realm of my explanation as well as a 'real pandemic' explanation. This fact has multiple viable interpretations, and is therefore less relevant than others.
Basically, you're focusing on the wrong facts because they have valid explanations that fall within my suggestion as well as the official one. You need to find facts that can't be explained in any other way than 'real pandemic'.