So this was reposted (after removing the ridiculous azt mention) five minutes after I mentioned it and it is still stupid because viruses are not bacteria.
Thanks, may I ask if you know or if they happen to say, why hydroxychloroquine and not chloroquine? I've wondered this because I have never seen hydroxy used virally.
I like you and I'm sorry if I was bitchy. I dont understand, I guess, how something like hydroxyq wouldn't have been more prominent in antiviral therapy over the years if it had any effect. It's been around, it's cheap.
Last night, Dr. Gregory Rigano was on the Ingraham Angle with this info. It was weird because they were having tech difficulties and then she kind of cut him off.
Chloroquine is used as an anti-malarial. Bill Gates has spent over a billion dollars on malaria research. Probably not connected of course, but his name just won't stay away from this new SARS-CoV-2 (the actual name of the virus).
Bill has funded so much anti-viral and anti-malarial research that his name is all over stuff everywhere. In fact his first philanthropic gesture was to look for a cure for malaria, so after twenty years he’s going to be connected to a lot of research just via critical mass.
Since hydrochloriquine is a known and tested drug, I'm really not sure why it wouldn't be administered to those in high risk who can tolerate it. Even if it hasn't been through a year of testing, it seems that it would do no harm to administer and preferable to the alternative.
So this was reposted (after removing the ridiculous azt mention) five minutes after I mentioned it and it is still stupid because viruses are not bacteria.
I appreciate your response, I dont speak french. I dont agree with the blanket use of a broad spectrum antibiotic if not necessary.
Thanks, may I ask if you know or if they happen to say, why hydroxychloroquine and not chloroquine? I've wondered this because I have never seen hydroxy used virally.
I like you and I'm sorry if I was bitchy. I dont understand, I guess, how something like hydroxyq wouldn't have been more prominent in antiviral therapy over the years if it had any effect. It's been around, it's cheap.
Your response has not aged well...
You're not thinking of quinine, right, because that's not hydroxychloroquine. Just watching out for fellow pedes.
So why dont they just give this shit to the people that are about to die anyway even before it's been tested?
THIS NEEDS A STICKY, PLEASE!!
Here's the YT vid in Elon Musk's tweet that explains the study that was done in CHYNA
https://youtu.be/vE4_LsftNKM
Last night, Dr. Gregory Rigano was on the Ingraham Angle with this info. It was weird because they were having tech difficulties and then she kind of cut him off.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/huge-new-study-reveals-taking-chloroquine-fights-off-covid-19-in-6-days-and-works-as-preventative-from-coronavirus-infection/
Chloroquine is used as an anti-malarial. Bill Gates has spent over a billion dollars on malaria research. Probably not connected of course, but his name just won't stay away from this new SARS-CoV-2 (the actual name of the virus).
Bill has funded so much anti-viral and anti-malarial research that his name is all over stuff everywhere. In fact his first philanthropic gesture was to look for a cure for malaria, so after twenty years he’s going to be connected to a lot of research just via critical mass.
Since hydrochloriquine is a known and tested drug, I'm really not sure why it wouldn't be administered to those in high risk who can tolerate it. Even if it hasn't been through a year of testing, it seems that it would do no harm to administer and preferable to the alternative.