It's worse than that. They say that the "balance" of interests has shifted, the company is out of their reach and they'd have to show their evidence. Well, the company was always out of reach in Russia, the only thing that really "shifted" here is that the company showed up and asked to see the evidence against them.
So they accidentally admit by saying this that they were going for a win by default here, because they cite no other thing that has changed and the only way they ever could have gone through a trial without revealing this is if the company didn't show up in court.
I think that's a rather amazing admission, personally, and I don't think they intended to make it, but they did this sort of thing several times in their briefs. So the entire thing is a farce and they basically just admitted to it in court without seeming to realize that fact.
So basically their bluff was called and they had nothing. They expected it to be a trial with only a prossie and the defence in absence. Typical lefties preying on the defenseless.
I remember an article a couple of years ago that basically stated just that.
What would the incentive be for a Russian national to come to America to defend themselves to a corrupt kangaroo court that's leaving a trail of partisanship and corruption than can be seen from space.
They put papa away for 2 weeks for getting a date wrong... What would happen to an alleged Russian hacker that crippled their dear Hilary?
Mueller thought he had a free licence to print indictments and he did just that.
Indeed, but we knew that from the start. To me the fascinating part is that they ended up admitting it in court, seemingly without realizing what they had said.
Mueller is a criminal and needs to be locked up. His best buddy Bill Barr is the last person on earth who should have been appointed as attorney general.
I remember back just before this came out, Trump was having a good week after many weeks of media-driven bad stuff (mainly Stormy Daniels stuff IIRC) and then out of the blue Team Mueller announces this idiotic indictment and the media had something new to focus on, anything to keep from covering the good news for America.
And of course the case is dismissed at the height of concern over the Wu-Flu pandemic. All of the lawyers involved in bringing forth this completely bogus prosecution should be disbarred. This is textbook prosecutorial misconduct.
I dont think either of them have dementia. More of a case of they know all of the wrong stuff they've done so it's time to start working on the incompetent defense.
In criminal prosecutions, dismissal with prejudice bars the government from prosecuting the accused later on the same charge. A dismissal with prejudice is made in response to a motion to the court by the defendant or by the court sua sponte, if the accused is deprived of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.
Actually big news as this looks likes beginning of the end “Publicly” for Mueller his Clintonista lawyer CRIME team. Worth Pinning Mods!
You have to read between the lines.
They're dismissing it because its out of jurisdiction.
Either the judge is sensible or corrupt.
For a sensible judge it's an easy motion.
For a corrupt judge the reason to drop the case fast is this:
The company isn't in any way different to any other marketing and lobbying company.
Those companies are all around the world.
Their clients could also be anyone from anywhere.
The real question is who paid them?
That's not something the left might want released.
That and now that it's rendering properly the company apparently also didn't exist at the time.
It's worse than that. They say that the "balance" of interests has shifted, the company is out of their reach and they'd have to show their evidence. Well, the company was always out of reach in Russia, the only thing that really "shifted" here is that the company showed up and asked to see the evidence against them.
So they accidentally admit by saying this that they were going for a win by default here, because they cite no other thing that has changed and the only way they ever could have gone through a trial without revealing this is if the company didn't show up in court.
I think that's a rather amazing admission, personally, and I don't think they intended to make it, but they did this sort of thing several times in their briefs. So the entire thing is a farce and they basically just admitted to it in court without seeming to realize that fact.
So basically their bluff was called and they had nothing. They expected it to be a trial with only a prossie and the defence in absence. Typical lefties preying on the defenseless.
All those indictments of Russians were BS because they knew they were never going to show up to face the charges. I guess this one did though.
I remember an article a couple of years ago that basically stated just that.
What would the incentive be for a Russian national to come to America to defend themselves to a corrupt kangaroo court that's leaving a trail of partisanship and corruption than can be seen from space.
They put papa away for 2 weeks for getting a date wrong... What would happen to an alleged Russian hacker that crippled their dear Hilary?
Mueller thought he had a free licence to print indictments and he did just that.
Mueller wasn’t doing shit but sitting in a chair and drooling. It was all Weissman and his team of hitmen.
Yeah I agree, he was pretty obviously just a figurehead controlled by the Clintonistas.
Indeed, but we knew that from the start. To me the fascinating part is that they ended up admitting it in court, seemingly without realizing what they had said.
When is Mueller going to jail? And Yates. Clinesmith. Lynch. Holder. Strzok, Page. Ohr. Blasey-Ford. Ohr (again). Feinstein. McCabe, Schiff. Biden. Clinton. Biden. Clinton. Ramirez. Swetnick. Avanatti (for the Kanvanaugh crap). Brennan. Obama. Any Epstein customer. Comey. Clapper. .....
Mueller is a criminal and needs to be locked up. His best buddy Bill Barr is the last person on earth who should have been appointed as attorney general.
r/The_Mueller still exists. LMAO.
I'd post a snide remark there but they banned me after calling me a Nazi months ago.
Commy Leftist bastards...
Yep and there's a post about this story there...with only a handful of miserably salty commenters.
You’ll just need a suicide glance.
I remember back just before this came out, Trump was having a good week after many weeks of media-driven bad stuff (mainly Stormy Daniels stuff IIRC) and then out of the blue Team Mueller announces this idiotic indictment and the media had something new to focus on, anything to keep from covering the good news for America.
Usually around him hitting 50% approval rating the next hoax would drop, like clockwork.
The company they orginally indicted didn't exist at the time Mueller/Weissmans hoax claim they did.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/disaster-mueller-indicted-russian-company-didnt-ryan-saavedra
Wow.
And of course the case is dismissed at the height of concern over the Wu-Flu pandemic. All of the lawyers involved in bringing forth this completely bogus prosecution should be disbarred. This is textbook prosecutorial misconduct.
He didn't know what fusion GPS was, the fing creator of the dossier, which was the pretext for ALL of this.
Sure he didn’t know who Fusion GPS is. They’ve been operating as a contractor for the FBI for years.
I dont think either of them have dementia. More of a case of they know all of the wrong stuff they've done so it's time to start working on the incompetent defense.
Mueller, Hillary, and Biden all have "Colonel Klink" dementia.
" I know nothing..."
But they are the elite!
Mueller no
Biden yes
He's the spy chief in charge of the patriot act, I don't buy the senility angle
Yeah, yet these coup plotters still roam free. How much money did that team of lawyers make on that sham?
Must be nice to get rich off a sham and pay 0 consequences. Meanwhile, plebs of the world can't work because of Wu Flu tyranny.
What does "with prejudice" mean?
"A case dismissed with prejudice is over and done with, once and for all, and can't be brought back to court."
Basically the judge leaned into the microphone
said "Wrong"
and banged his gavel.
And everyone with any sense clapped.
and the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths and carp and anchovies and orangutans and breakfast cereals and fruit bats and large chu..
In criminal prosecutions, dismissal with prejudice bars the government from prosecuting the accused later on the same charge. A dismissal with prejudice is made in response to a motion to the court by the defendant or by the court sua sponte, if the accused is deprived of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/d/dismissed-with-prejudice/
And the msm will be on full ignore ...
Not done yet, it's a request
And the wall came tumbling dowwwwwwn.....
Hold up. We gave tax dollars to investigate a company during a period of time before they existed. Thats fucking treason 💯💯
So the whole point of the Mueller investigation was just to catch people in procedural crimes?
Would be an opportune time while everyone are quarantined to blast this through the media and wake up the normies
It was the case against the Russian company Concord...
Saved you the time and not clicking on clickbait title.
Spez: LOL @ being downvoted for calling out clickbait cucks.
Awwww! The OP crying about getting called out over clickbait!
ADORABLE!
If you didn't, you wouldn't be
a) Be recycling my insults
and
b) replying like a ten year old girl after she got caught with her hand in the cookie jar.
#YouPlayedYourself
Idiot.