30
Comments (4)
sorted by:
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
agile_a [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like this. I think it's too lenient

it sounds like that scene from The office with Jim and Dwight and demerits

I have a 5 strike rule and it should work like this. Three strikes and your network gets a hefty fine. 5 strikes and your network that's double that fine. every strike after that your network gets another fnee

and once you reach 9 strikes the network gets put under review by White House counsel who can determine whether or not it's allowed to continue publishing

I think the specifics of that stuff can be hashed out but I completely agree with your general premise..

1
bobconserv 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need a Website that does nothing but call out Media reports It will be called FAKE NEWS

1
agile_a [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

plenty of websites that call out media reports of fake news. They accomplish nothing. some people use those websites some people don't. it doesn't stop them from reporting fake news. it doesn't stop them from making all the liberals think that Trump called the coronavirus a hoax. Even though it was fact-checked most liberal still think that happened. Because they don't go to other websites. They get their news from a specific set of three or four far left propaganda websites and anything outside their bubble is fake news to them. you can't change that by creating yet another website. they're not going to go to your website..

solution is to put restrictions on these media outlets or at least punish them when they purposely report fake news. And we know that they do. we have so much evidence against them it's ridiculous. it wouldn't even be a struggle if we were to take something like that to court. mountains of evidence. from their own CEOs caught on hidden camera 2 news anchors caught on hidden camera to even anchors and members of their own staff coming forward and saying that they feel restricted not allowed to report the truth. we have MOUNTAINS of evidence. if the Democrats had even half of that kind of evidence against Fox News it would have already been shut down completely. They would have just mandated them to dissolve

problem is that we need to push for regulations on these media outlets. if that hurts them? Good. when did I need to stop letting the Republican party be controlled by libertarians. libertarians are not what they claim. They tell you they just want to protect their gay friends weed farm with an AR-15. That's not what libertarianism is. That's bullshit..

libertarianism is corporate lobbying. That's all it is. That's why they never take the side against the corporation under any circumstance. think about it. You've never seen libertarians take the opposing stance to the major corporate sense. They have ALWAYS defended corporations above all Else

the letting them control the GOP is a recipe for the GOP doing nothing against out of control companies. including the media and Facebook..

scientists take a stand. it's time to realize that the purpose of the Republican party is not to increase corporate profits solely. if that happens great. but that is not the purpose of the Republican party..

it's not to protect corporations it is to protect the people..

you need to demand common Sense restrictions on these media outlets