30
posted ago by Taggart ago by Taggart +30 / -0

First the good news: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/huge-new-study-reveals-taking-chloroquine-fights-off-covid-19-in-6-days-and-works-as-preventative-from-coronavirus-infection/

Second the provable WHO lie:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/exclusive-evidence-shows-director-general-of-world-health-organization-severely-overstated-the-fatality-rate-of-the-coronavirus-leading-to-the-greatest-global-panic-in-history/

Ya see the problem? The same logic would have the seasonal flu at 10%. We are going to kill small businesses and lay people off over false positives and faulty logic.

Third false positives as described by pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32133832/

“Results: When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67%, in contrast, the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%.”

The media might want to include that in their fear porn. Yes if you are part of the population susceptible you should be concerned and take appropriate measures. But ask yourself as compared to what? For example, how many tests on hospice and medically compromised people who died and are being attributed to coronovirus, when they might have just died of complications from the flu, which is killing a lot more people on average.

Or put another way. How many cases and deaths attributed to corona are actually just the seasonal flu based on info above about false tests? We panic over one and not the other?

This is a serious question. What is the average death rate in a given period given an age group? There is no doubt something is going on, but are we attributing too many deaths to coronovirus that maybe should be attributed to something else or multiple something else’s? But when you attribute it to one thing it looks way worse than if it was a combination of other things? Make sense? Based on the false positives are people overreacting and attributing a far higher death rate and infection rate as compared to what may already be an average death rate in that group?

In WA state for example, most people died in the one nursing home. But when digging into it, could they have gotten the normal flu or pneumonia that killed them, but the test created false positives and we attributed it to the coronovirus?

Thoughts?

Comments (2)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
DicksOutForHarambe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe death to infection is around 0.1-0.2