Edit: I'll keep this post but as was pointed out below I was in a pretty foul mood when typing this. I truly hope this treatment works, but don't like the way its being shilled and interpreted.
Downvote all you want, I'll keep saying this tonight.
Read page 10 regarding demographics, they did some super shifty stuff in moving around and disqualifying individuals in this test, hell one of the people died and they decide to just ignore them and remove them from the study. The 100% cure rate is the result of strategic number crunching not necessarily the effectiveness of the drug. This will absolutely need to be replicated before it gets any credence. Bad clinical trials might as well be no clinical trials.
There's an enormous results replication problem in all science fields, and PEER REVIEWED journal articles are more often than not junk. Pay attention to follow up studies.
Edit: I'll keep this post but as was pointed out below I was in a pretty foul mood when typing this. I truly hope this treatment works, but don't like the way its being shilled and interpreted.
Downvote all you want, I'll keep saying this tonight.
Read page 10 regarding demographics, they did some super shifty stuff in moving around and disqualifying individuals in this test, hell one of the people died and they decide to just ignore them and remove them from the study. The 100% cure rate is the result of strategic number crunching not necessarily the effectiveness of the drug. This will absolutely need to be replicated before it gets any credence. Bad clinical trials might as well be no clinical trials.
There's an enormous results replication problem in all science fields, and PEER REVIEWED journal articles are more often than not junk. Pay attention to follow up studies.