So less time for COVID, and more than double the cases reported. Another week of COVID to make it the same length of time as that Swine Flu stat; if it carries on like this it'll be well over 300,000 by then,
Maybe that's some other error bias in the reporting. Maybe it was far more spread. I've heard models of COVID reported being 1/6th of actual cases. However I guess the same thing happened with Swine flu - don't know.
I think the concern is about pace of spread. The death rate appears low enough, and focused mostly on sickly / elderly people, that I don't think it's particularly alarming. Spread evenly across a year or two we'd barely notice it. But if it is quick enough, then it seems like a risk.
To me that should be our number one goal at the moment - randomised testing in the population to determine how many really have it, then what models are most accurate, so we can forecast real replication rate and real hospitalisation rates.
Either numbers could be wrong. But until we know if they're wrong, we should be working to confirm them, and slowing things down until we do.
thanks. Yes. The concern is how fast it happens. I dislike seeing things like this stickied because it only encourages people to think POTUS is somehow playing a game and isn't serious about the guidelines right now.
Italy's hospitals getting overwhelmed is a fact too. You fundamentally don't understand what makes this virus a threat. So many comments in this thread aren't going to age well when in a few weeks NYC's hospitals can't handle the massive influx of new patients.
Swine Flu
12th May 2009: 5000, 30 countries
15th July 2009: 100,000, 124 countries
https://www.who.int/wer/2009/wer8430.pdf?ua=1 https://www.who.int/wer/2009/wer8420.pdf?ua=1
China Flu
28th Jan 2020: 4600, 14 countries
20th March 2020: 240,000, 166 countries
So less time for COVID, and more than double the cases reported. Another week of COVID to make it the same length of time as that Swine Flu stat; if it carries on like this it'll be well over 300,000 by then,
Maybe that's some other error bias in the reporting. Maybe it was far more spread. I've heard models of COVID reported being 1/6th of actual cases. However I guess the same thing happened with Swine flu - don't know.
I think the concern is about pace of spread. The death rate appears low enough, and focused mostly on sickly / elderly people, that I don't think it's particularly alarming. Spread evenly across a year or two we'd barely notice it. But if it is quick enough, then it seems like a risk.
To me that should be our number one goal at the moment - randomised testing in the population to determine how many really have it, then what models are most accurate, so we can forecast real replication rate and real hospitalisation rates.
Either numbers could be wrong. But until we know if they're wrong, we should be working to confirm them, and slowing things down until we do.
thanks. Yes. The concern is how fast it happens. I dislike seeing things like this stickied because it only encourages people to think POTUS is somehow playing a game and isn't serious about the guidelines right now.
Nonsense. These are facts. Quit denying it
Italy's hospitals getting overwhelmed is a fact too. You fundamentally don't understand what makes this virus a threat. So many comments in this thread aren't going to age well when in a few weeks NYC's hospitals can't handle the massive influx of new patients.