22
CNN: The End (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by ENVYNITAZ ago by ENVYNITAZ +22 / -0
Comments (15)
sorted by:
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
ENVYNITAZ [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

hahahahahahahahahaha

3
Scuffers 3 points ago +4 / -1

do we actually have any evidence that it's more letham than any other flu? (I'm thinking influenza here)

1
ENVYNITAZ [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

people get sick and die . . . welcome to life, Alarmists

0
BeauBidenBrainTumor 0 points ago +2 / -2

We do. Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.

2
45forever 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see your comment below as well, so I’ll just ask my question here- has WHO come out with a new fatality rate? Cuz, I’m pretty sure they were way off.

1
BeauBidenBrainTumor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Updated data would be nice. That data will vary by location, at minimum. The mitigation measures have worked where implemented, which should lower the number. The name of the game was closing borders first, which the USA has been semi-successful with.

1
Scuffers 1 point ago +1 / -0

is that 3.4% figure credible though?

Any numbers we get from China are obviously questionable, as are the Italian stats

1
BigCovfefe 1 point ago +2 / -1

It is more contagious, but your numbers are misleading. You are talking about "reported" cases. Currently in the USA, mortality rate is 1.2% based on reported cases. MOST people are not reporting they have it. So it is substantially less than 1.2%

With the flu each you, all the numbers you are seeing not on reported cases. Just estimates such as 30 million people get the flue and 30,000 die from it. But the difference here is that 30 million people are not getting a confirmed result of flu.

1
BeauBidenBrainTumor 1 point ago +1 / -0

The reported/unreported critique is fair, but also applies to COVID-19 as well. It's only proven dangerous to the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions. Most people show no symptoms but could transmit to at-risk people. That's why mitigation measures are in effect. The low fatality rate is a sign of mitigation success, not that it mitigation isn't needed. The goal will be to see hospital capacity freed up, which is a struggle within more populated areas.

3
4morebeers 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oliver always pushes back.

0
BeauBidenBrainTumor 0 points ago +2 / -2

COVID-19 is indeed far more lethal, but it is not as contagious as the flu, at least according to the WHO. The decision to resume normal life, to whatever degree, is much more nuanced than these CNN types would like to think it is.

https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---3-march-2020

1
ENVYNITAZ [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

at least according to the WHO

WHAT A FUCKING JOKE

2
BeauBidenBrainTumor 2 points ago +2 / -0

I assume your data comes from Alex Jones? Even the CDC acknowledges that COVID-19 is more lethal than the flu, but doesn't assign percentage values since lethality varies by location and patient age.

1
ENVYNITAZ [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK THEN . . . DO YOUR dd