So it's still .1% infection rate based on your numbers... And death rate of those infected is about 1% or so ... Seems like a low rate all around what's the issue?
"Infected" doesn't mean sick, though. How many of those are mild to moderate colds the likes of which they get annually, and how many are actually in a condition that would actually require medical intervention other than that called for out of an "overabundance of caution"?
The premise that they need to be in lockdown to avoid infections is an affirming the consequence. It's cold season. People are being colds. People with compromised immune systems can have an immunological response that leads to phneumonia. Nothing is new here. Your promise about the Chinese New year is incorrect as well btw. Again, another signing the consequence fallacy. Also, your defensive speaks volumes. You don't think you're being hysterical, but you are. Be angry at the uselected officials who you've allowed to control you. Be mad at yourself for allowing it.
The premise that they need to be in lockdown to avoid infections is an affirming the consequence. It's cold season. People are being colds. People with compromised immune systems can have an immunological response that leads to phneumonia. Nothing is new here. Your premise about the Chinese New year is incorrect as well btw. Again, another affirming the consequence fallacy. Also, your defensive speaks volumes. You don't think you're being hysterical, but you are. Be angry at the uselected officials who you've allowed to control you. Be mad at yourself for allowing it.
It is also because NYC is dirty, disgusting and very dense.
...just like Nancy Pelosi.
So it's still .1% infection rate based on your numbers... And death rate of those infected is about 1% or so ... Seems like a low rate all around what's the issue?
Allright virus bigot, don't you know how uncomfortable the sniffles and a mild fever is! Have you no shame!
"Infected" doesn't mean sick, though. How many of those are mild to moderate colds the likes of which they get annually, and how many are actually in a condition that would actually require medical intervention other than that called for out of an "overabundance of caution"?
It's because covid-19 is already spread everywhere and its a weak virus, weaker than the flu. Watch the numbers rise but deaths stay low.
The premise that they need to be in lockdown to avoid infections is an affirming the consequence. It's cold season. People are being colds. People with compromised immune systems can have an immunological response that leads to phneumonia. Nothing is new here. Your promise about the Chinese New year is incorrect as well btw. Again, another signing the consequence fallacy. Also, your defensive speaks volumes. You don't think you're being hysterical, but you are. Be angry at the uselected officials who you've allowed to control you. Be mad at yourself for allowing it.
The premise that they need to be in lockdown to avoid infections is an affirming the consequence. It's cold season. People are being colds. People with compromised immune systems can have an immunological response that leads to phneumonia. Nothing is new here. Your premise about the Chinese New year is incorrect as well btw. Again, another affirming the consequence fallacy. Also, your defensive speaks volumes. You don't think you're being hysterical, but you are. Be angry at the uselected officials who you've allowed to control you. Be mad at yourself for allowing it.
Hello fellow winners!