65
Comments (35)
sorted by:
3
Siteless_Vagrant 3 points ago +3 / -0

YOU MEAN LIKE TO DELIVER SUPPLIES?? I'M DOWN!!! https://youtu.be/Sd5ZLJWQmss

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
Nomadicscape -2 points ago +1 / -3

Harassment and intimidation are tactics of the left.

4
humblehonkpillfarmer 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Use of weapons and battlefield planning are tactics of the victor"

  • some extinct peoples
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Nomadicscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you don't match your "weapons and tactics" appropriately to this "battlefield" you'll lose before you even start. Imagine bringing a tank on an operation that requires stealth.

3
_Cabal_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Being pacified is a tactic of the right?

1
Nomadicscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a difference between pacification and being wise about the action you take. It's easy to talk big on the internet.

1
_Cabal_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not promoting obedient submission is now "talking big on the internet." Wow. The beta conditioning is really paying off, I see.

1
Nomadicscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

Talk is cheap. Actions triumph words. Go out and tactfully convince people why you are right by showing them through your actions. Provide evidence and solutions in a way that is respectful and digestible. You need to win the hearts of the people that put her in office. At the end of the day that's what will make a lasting difference.

1
_Cabal_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. .

.

.

Oh, you're being serious. You actually think that's a viable strategy. That's precious. Unfortunately, it's also incredibly naive.

How many more decades should we continue testing your thesis to no avail before we accept that it's erroneous?

You understand that the people who vote for her are completely alien, right? We don't even speak the same language. We use the same words, but they have completely different meanings. We don't have the same values, the same goals, the same priorities, the same beliefs, the same morality, the same ethics. We don't see the same We don't think the same. We don't act the same. But, somehow we'll just magically get on the same page, huh?

What a novel idea that has never been tried before! Good luck with that. When they smash your skull with a bike lock, I won'tbother saying I told you so.

1
Nomadicscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are more people in America that fall in the center than those on the extreme sides. Those are the people you need to convince. It's actually one of the reasons why so many lifelong democrats walked away due to Pelosi's antics during the State of the Union and this stimulus package. Granted, I do see why it would seem to be an impossible task for those that are handicapped in critical thinking.

2
HeavenlyTrumpets 2 points ago +2 / -0

was it harrassment and intimidation when we chased the occupying British out of America? Are Pelosi and her ilk really any different?

0
Nomadicscape 0 points ago +1 / -1

These aren't war times. Your delusions of grandeur in your cause will only further cause problems for people who are actually making a difference.

2
jgardner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty sure General Washington harassed and intimidated the enemies of the US.

I'm find with killing people who are proven traitors. As soon as the trial is over, let's move to the execution square.

0
Nomadicscape 0 points ago +1 / -1

These aren't war times. Those who can only see using violence as a way to further their goals aren't people that should be trusted or followed.

1
jgardner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just because we haven't accepted the fact that there is an enemy trying to destroy us doesn't mean there isn't an enemy trying to destroy us.

1
Nomadicscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never said there wasn't. I was referring to you comparing this to an actual time where a real war was taking place.

2
TJac 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why they usually win.

0
Nomadicscape 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's why they lost the 2016 election and many other "battles" since then.

0
TJac 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yep "WE" have got it figured out.Best way to win a "battle"is to surrender.

1
Nomadicscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you feel your ideals aren't worth it, then sure surrender. Or you could be tactful and shoot for more long term goals that would incite change on a grander scale.

0
TJac 0 points ago +1 / -1

Such as?

1
Nomadicscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

Start with the people. Not the far left ideologues but those closer to the center that are open to hearing another side. Show them first and foremost how you aren't the demonized picture the left paints you to be. Then respectfully challenge why they think what they think while offering your viewpoint at the same time. Engage in discourse that is constructive and provide evidence as to why you believe your ideals are sound and deserve support. Like that one left-wing lady who visited a Trump rally and realized that her picture of "Trumptards" was entirely false, and it opened her eyes to a worldview that she hadn't realized existed.

And if you want to play an even longer more effective game. Create competition and support people with similar ideals to your own. We need competition for Hollywood and corpos that are owned by the left. Not necessarily to promote your political ideals but to dilute the amount of poison being pumped into our culture. There's a desire for a market out there for media that doesn't have political manipulation behind it.

And for the longest game. Have children, raise them and educate them instead of letting the government indoctrinate them. Though it's unfortunate at the end of the day it is a numbers game and the more people you have on your side the better. That saying "change starts at the home" holds more weight than I think people realize.

0
TJac 0 points ago +1 / -1

Noble.But I.M.O.kinda naive.Right about the children though.Rather proud of mine.