This site aggregates all local county health department data. If a local health organization inflates their numbers, there should be extreme and immediate penalty. I'm pretty sure that's why the "surveillance" phrase.
Yes. Have been tracking since 3/11 and the increased testing is apparent.
However, what I've noticed is more and more distancing between tracking sites.
The one Fox uses--Johns Hopkins--is total SHITE, IMO. It is the one I think must be under the DS influence--oddly, because I would have thought the CDC site would be. They use it because it paints the most horrific picture.
However, there is a variance of about 30% now between it and the CDC site for total cases and deaths.
Impossible to know what the real story is, so I'm thinking that the COVIDTracking.com site, which is fed only from local sources, is the most sound.
This site aggregates all local county health department data. If a local health organization inflates their numbers, there should be extreme and immediate penalty. I'm pretty sure that's why the "surveillance" phrase.
https://covidtracking.com/us-daily/
Yes. Have been tracking since 3/11 and the increased testing is apparent.
However, what I've noticed is more and more distancing between tracking sites.
The one Fox uses--Johns Hopkins--is total SHITE, IMO. It is the one I think must be under the DS influence--oddly, because I would have thought the CDC site would be. They use it because it paints the most horrific picture.
However, there is a variance of about 30% now between it and the CDC site for total cases and deaths.
Impossible to know what the real story is, so I'm thinking that the COVIDTracking.com site, which is fed only from local sources, is the most sound.