2456 Looks like a third rate Grandstander named @RepThomasMassie, a Congressman from, unfortunately, a truly GREAT State, Kentucky, wants to vote against the new Save Our Workers Bill in Congress. He just wants the publicity. He can’t stop it, only delay, which is both dangerous...... (twitter.com) posted 1 year ago by GEOTUS_speaks 1 year ago by GEOTUS_speaks +2456 / -0 456 comments share 456 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (456) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 6 ▼ – Konsaki 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0 Oh, I got that fact easily. I was pissed that you linked a paywalled NYslimes page instead of an archive link. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – RiverFenix 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0 This article isn't paywalled, at least not for me... I think the only time you have to pay is if you want to view the original in PDF I'm sure they were biased even back then, but the NYT was once the rag of repute. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Razmus 3 points 1 year ago +4 / -1 It's not about the pay wall. It's about denying them the ad click and page view numbers. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – RiverFenix 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0 Let them know thedonald.win exists so they can write a hit piece about us and bring in more normies who didn't know we exist. Best way for them to learn we exist is to have 25% of their incoming traffic coming from here. I hear you though. I don't necessarily want to give them any traffic - just don't shoot me! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – slangin_paint 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0 It is also about the Failing New York Times' ability to remove the article or change the link once they see it getting traction. The archive is the back-up. permalink parent save report block reply
Oh, I got that fact easily. I was pissed that you linked a paywalled NYslimes page instead of an archive link.
This article isn't paywalled, at least not for me...
I think the only time you have to pay is if you want to view the original in PDF
I'm sure they were biased even back then, but the NYT was once the rag of repute.
It's not about the pay wall. It's about denying them the ad click and page view numbers.
Let them know thedonald.win exists so they can write a hit piece about us and bring in more normies who didn't know we exist.
Best way for them to learn we exist is to have 25% of their incoming traffic coming from here.
I hear you though. I don't necessarily want to give them any traffic - just don't shoot me!
It is also about the Failing New York Times' ability to remove the article or change the link once they see it getting traction. The archive is the back-up.