I would argue most women are unfit to lead. Maybe they are fine in some positions, but all you have to do is read a little bit of history to know Matriarchy's are some of the most violent, corrupt, and horrible times in any Nations history.
Thank you! Lady pede here, and unless you're talking about small municipal government, 99% of these emotionally incontinent, easily manipulated, affirmative action hires fall well below any objective standard of quality leadership and do way more harm than good. The Margaret Thatchers come along once a generation.
YOu articulated what I mean much better than I could have. It isn't about sexism, it is just about the way we are built and what both sexes are respectively good at.
I love reading history and it really has taught me a lot. There have been plenty of horrible leaders that were men as well. But by a large margin Matriarchal governments were big failures rather than successes.
The thing is I get that everyone wants representation. That is currently one of our greatest issues in the US right now. This is why whenever Hillary had a "rally" or speech 80% of the crowd was women. This is why Counties with a high muslim population have voted in muslim representatives. The US is always going to have this issue going forward. And Democrats love playing this game of identity politics. So i don't blame some women wanting female representatives or leadership. I can level with them. But many/most are unfit to lead as I said, and as you clearly understand.
Men and women are wired differently. I have law degree and have managed employees. Would I be a good president? Hell no. I'm a mother and I would have a very hard time sending someone else's sons to war. Which means I would probably endanger even more lives with my navel gazing. Can women do amazing things? Sure. But we don't need to be men or do everything men do.
Women want representation because they hate/distrust men. Think about it. I have full confidence in Trump to do the right thing, so I don't really need to consider what he's doing day to day and microanalyze it.
I disagree on that to a certain extent. There's been excellent woman leaders throughout history but they were women fighting in a man's world. The hysterical, crazy women rise to the top when men become weak, dull, selfish and fat. When men disengage from the world and pursue their own selfish interest and give into their base desires, the women start taking over. The women don't take over and show maturity and strength but instead, give in to their emotions, hysteria and irrationality. Strong women in history have usually been surrounded by strong men, not the sisterhood. The same is true of strong men in history.
And the only reason hasn't collapsed completely onto itself is because the nation is buoyed by huge offshore oil resources that help them finance all their progressive ideals.....keep that in mind when some socialist gets in your face with a "what about Norway?!" argument.
I would argue most women are unfit to lead. Maybe they are fine in some positions, but all you have to do is read a little bit of history to know Matriarchy's are some of the most violent, corrupt, and horrible times in any Nations history.
Thank you! Lady pede here, and unless you're talking about small municipal government, 99% of these emotionally incontinent, easily manipulated, affirmative action hires fall well below any objective standard of quality leadership and do way more harm than good. The Margaret Thatchers come along once a generation.
YOu articulated what I mean much better than I could have. It isn't about sexism, it is just about the way we are built and what both sexes are respectively good at.
I love reading history and it really has taught me a lot. There have been plenty of horrible leaders that were men as well. But by a large margin Matriarchal governments were big failures rather than successes.
The thing is I get that everyone wants representation. That is currently one of our greatest issues in the US right now. This is why whenever Hillary had a "rally" or speech 80% of the crowd was women. This is why Counties with a high muslim population have voted in muslim representatives. The US is always going to have this issue going forward. And Democrats love playing this game of identity politics. So i don't blame some women wanting female representatives or leadership. I can level with them. But many/most are unfit to lead as I said, and as you clearly understand.
Men and women are wired differently. I have law degree and have managed employees. Would I be a good president? Hell no. I'm a mother and I would have a very hard time sending someone else's sons to war. Which means I would probably endanger even more lives with my navel gazing. Can women do amazing things? Sure. But we don't need to be men or do everything men do.
Women want representation because they hate/distrust men. Think about it. I have full confidence in Trump to do the right thing, so I don't really need to consider what he's doing day to day and microanalyze it.
I disagree on that to a certain extent. There's been excellent woman leaders throughout history but they were women fighting in a man's world. The hysterical, crazy women rise to the top when men become weak, dull, selfish and fat. When men disengage from the world and pursue their own selfish interest and give into their base desires, the women start taking over. The women don't take over and show maturity and strength but instead, give in to their emotions, hysteria and irrationality. Strong women in history have usually been surrounded by strong men, not the sisterhood. The same is true of strong men in history.
I agree. Norway being a perfect example.
And the only reason hasn't collapsed completely onto itself is because the nation is buoyed by huge offshore oil resources that help them finance all their progressive ideals.....keep that in mind when some socialist gets in your face with a "what about Norway?!" argument.