"And so it falls upon this court to weigh the constitutional rights of the Virus with the constitutional rights of the Patient.
There is very little precedent in this new area of law. This has to do with the historical treatment of viruses as "nonliving" and furthermore, they had no legal representation.
However, the court finds that viruses, and indeed other parasites, have the same constitutional protections as other multicellular lifeforms such as for example white men.
Heretofore, an injunction is immediately placed upon the killing of viruses, through chemical means or otherwise. Each patient must bring its complaint to the court and provide evidence that the virus will indeed kill them without such treatment."
"And so it falls upon this court to weigh the constitutional rights of the Virus with the constitutional rights of the Patient.
There is very little precedent in this new area of law. This has to do with the historical treatment of viruses as "nonliving" and furthermore, they had no legal representation.
However, the court finds that viruses, and indeed other parasites, have the same constitutional protections as other multicellular lifeforms such as for example white men.
Heretofore, an injunction is immediately placed upon the killing of viruses, through chemical means or otherwise. Each patient must bring its complaint to the court and provide evidence that the virus will indeed kill them without such treatment."