484
Comments (11)
sorted by:
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Wess-mantooth 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the royal family thought they should have security, they would. They have renounced their royalty, they dont get to pick and choose.

3
Roadrash 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shouldn’t even let them in

1
marsajane1949 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't Merkel an American citizen? If so they have to.

2
marsajane1949 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, she was born in LA. So she can't be denied entry.

3
gnomenclature 3 points ago +3 / -0

How narcissistic do you have to be to expect other people, people who aren't your countrymen, to pay to keep your azz safe. If it's true that they asked, that's unbelievable. And yet, it's entirely believable.

2
Wess-mantooth 2 points ago +2 / -0

They aren't royalty, they don't need protection, if they want it they can pay for it like everybody else

2
Canadean 2 points ago +2 / -0

don't worry, just because they left Canada doesn't mean they're not collecting Canadian welfare anymore. fuck this backwards ass country

2
eternal_dance 2 points ago +2 / -0

US spending security resources to protect UK royalty is best reserved for brief state visits.

It's best assigned to Lt. Det. Frank Drebin, of Police Squad.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0