Probably just more objective and impartial people vs. better. It does not take a particularly good scientist to look at studies - the sample size, source, methodology, etc. and current data, and determine if something is logical/probable or not. It is what it is, good or bad, but I really feel some people, even scientists, inject their beliefs and biases, both for and against Trump. As more data comes in, there should be more of a consensus, but it seems that’s not the case.
Where does he think the president gets his advice? Could it be from better "scientists" than this guy even has access to?
Probably just more objective and impartial people vs. better. It does not take a particularly good scientist to look at studies - the sample size, source, methodology, etc. and current data, and determine if something is logical/probable or not. It is what it is, good or bad, but I really feel some people, even scientists, inject their beliefs and biases, both for and against Trump. As more data comes in, there should be more of a consensus, but it seems that’s not the case.
Thar RINO looks like a Rhino