They are liberals. They think morals are subjective so when they take a stance on something their stance is weak as fuck. Look at open borders. For 4 years they state something, but then when something like a virus that might effect them personally comes along they change their mind in less than 5 minutes. They are fucking pathetic.
Communist morals follow a simple formula. Anything which promotes the communist cause is good; anything which hinders it is bad. Upon examination, that philosophy turns out to be a code of opportunism and expediency, or a code of no morals at all. Anyone who does not conform to the dictates of the Party as to what is good for Communism and what is not, is subjected to the most severe penalties under Articles 131 and 133 of the Soviet Constitution.
Great, now I understand their moral stance and how it changes every other week. However, it's saddening to finally realize this is what's going on. Isn't believing in some old ass backwards thing created by old rich white men against their morals (oh wait, it changed to suit the fact the only candidate they have is an old rich white man).
They are liberals. They think morals are subjective so when they take a stance on something their stance is weak as fuck. Look at open borders. For 4 years they state something, but then when something like a virus that might effect them personally comes along they change their mind in less than 5 minutes. They are fucking pathetic.
in "The Naked Communist", W. Cleon Skousen wrote:
Great, now I understand their moral stance and how it changes every other week. However, it's saddening to finally realize this is what's going on. Isn't believing in some old ass backwards thing created by old rich white men against their morals (oh wait, it changed to suit the fact the only candidate they have is an old rich white man).