2030
Comments (103)
sorted by:
140
MythArcana 140 points ago +141 / -1

Pelosi has conducted insider trading for 30 years, everyone knows it.

78
deleted 78 points ago +78 / -0
27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
7
Old_Nans_Gin_Flask 7 points ago +7 / -0

They created the "Pelosi Provision" to try to slow her roll, worked well I see

46
MegoThor 46 points ago +46 / -0

“It’s OK when we do it.”

-politicians

25
CoronaT_Virus 25 points ago +25 / -0

That’s why we need term limits and public records of elected officials income while in office and afterwards

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
1
stratocaster_patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they can be prosecuted but I know they passed a law that exempted them from online disclosure so most people will never know what they are up to. Obama had signed an act that was designed to crack down on insider trading but Congress gave themselves an out because they are all assholes.

1
MythArcana 1 point ago +1 / -0

If that wasn't bad enough, look at what Pelosi wants now in the next CV phase bill...Yup, tax cuts for the money she stole.

https://thedonald.win/p/FMOEIFAx/pelosi-pushes-tax-cut-for-the-we/c/s

2
MySidesGoUp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Booting h, right?

Oh- stocks...yup them too.

53
ProphetOfKek 53 points ago +54 / -1

Tempted!

59
deleted 59 points ago +59 / -0
29
ChuckedBeef 29 points ago +30 / -1

You know, you really have to wonder if this doesn't play a big part in the politics of California and in this case the entire country since she is also Speaker of the House. They may be clamping down so hard on retail businesses because they are incentivized to do so as it will raise their stock and make them millions of dollars. What other Governors and Mayors and Congressmen and Congresswomen bought stock in Amazon or other online delivery specialists knowing that the shutdown was ahead? How many of them are incentivised to keep it rollling so they can continue to enrich themselves?

13
DJT2020 13 points ago +13 / -0

It’s a conflict of interest. All their holdings should be in a blind trust as long as they are in office.

2
trumpORbust 2 points ago +3 / -1

Required for president, not Congress (smfh)

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Nellie_the_Beaut 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are all soulless criminals getting rich off the backs of Americans. Billionaire Kelly Loeffler - who bought her senate seat from the governor of GA - and her NYSE executive husband made millions on insider trading after she attended the classified senate briefing about Wuhan Virus. They dumped a bunch of stock, bought more bio stock and specifically bought huge shares in a work from home computer app. Those two made an obscene amount of trades (90+ in one day reportedly) and profit of millions of dollars the first two weeks after the national quarantine. And she’s trying to say that she “had no idea what her broker was doing” during that time. Riiiiight.

37
Titanium 37 points ago +38 / -1

So, we need to watch when $5M of amazon stock is sold in one go, and watch what other stock is bought 3 days later, so we can profit too?

Are they allowed to leak this information like they just did with their stock trades? I wonder if any AI is able to pick up on the specific trading method used for these transactions and learn to follow the behavior and make use of information that I assume is only available to congress.

It is not like anyone would be willing to trade directly with a congress person outside an exchange with anonymous orders, considering the disparity in information and legal protection between congress people and everyone else.

19
residue69 19 points ago +19 / -0

/r/wallstreetbets has a couple of posters that follow her trades when she releases her financial disclosure forms.

17
senditfordale3 17 points ago +17 / -0

I wouldn't doubt there are algorithms that account for it.

3
SirJiub 3 points ago +3 / -0

I remember reading on WSB that all of the trading done by those in Congress has a paper trail that anyone can see; however, it's difficult to shift through it all in a timely enough manner to make any meaningful use of it.

33
IncredibleMrE1 33 points ago +34 / -1

No one is above the law, except Democrats.

4
UpTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

They have the audacity to complain Republicans are doing insider trading. The top post on r/all last week was "5 Republicans sued for insider trading"

3
Returningtogod 3 points ago +3 / -0

Again - and as usual - PROJECTION. I'm not saying that R's haven't behaved badly. I'm saying that Dems do the same, but just scream at the top of their lungs, using their propagandists in the state media, to be sure that only R's actions are made into a public scandal.

27
deleted 27 points ago +28 / -1
11
bubblefarts 11 points ago +11 / -0

I’m also skeptical, would prefer to see where the information is coming from. Pelosi is not above something sketchy like this, but I don’t want to fall victim to confirmation bias.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
6
Marble68 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup - no sauce.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
4
Marble68 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is from 2019 and the strike price was set back then. That's point of options. You get it price X, and hope it's higher than that when you exercise them.

If X is below market price, and the delta is high enough to cover taxes and cost, it's good to buy.

1
tcriv 1 point ago +4 / -3

i get that, but when an ITM option expires (jan 2020) you have the right to buy them at that price

article says pelosi bought 3000 shares for 1600 dollars, financial disclosure proves it because she owned call options from years prior

1
NeverInterruptEnemy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Came to post this. Few people dislike Pelosi as much as I do... but this is bullshit.

The lowest amazon hit recently was 1800. And the highest after that was 2050 or so. Even if you work out some generous math, 5 million buys you 2777 shares and making $300 a share brings the best case profits to $833,000. Not millions, not one million.

Don’t need fakenews to make Pelosi look bad. Gatewaypundit sucks.

1
thatsallphoax 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was an option to purchase 3000 shares at $1600 which expired after 1/17/20. Basically what this means is that in 2018, Pelosi (Pelosi‘s husband) paid to purchase an asset (called an option) from someone that gives them the legal right to purchase 3000 shares from that someone at price of $1600/share. The person who sold the option was making a bet that amazon’s stock price would be at or lower than $1600 during the period of time before the option expired.

So let’s say AMZN stock was trading at $1550 during the last 2 years and never reached $1600. Pelosi’s husband would not exercise the option to pay $1600/share if he could purchase shares on the open market at $1550. Then after 1/17/20 when the option expires, the person who sold the option has successfully made the profit from originally selling the option, and never had to supply the shares.

However if the person who sold the option was incorrect in their bet about the stock price of AMZN, and the stock rose to $1800 (it did), then Pelosi’s husband has the right to purchase those shares for $1600 a piece from the person holding the option, and that person has to purchase 30 shares at the market rate of $1800 and deliver them to Pelosi’s husband at the agreed price of $1600. The option holder still gets the amount he was paid for the option itself, but they are out the amount of money they had to pay to acquire the shares minus the $1600 they receive for each share.

If Pelosi’s husband didn’t exercise this option on the 17th, the option would expire and they get nothing. The timing was poor, but this doesn’t indicate corruption. It’s just how options work.

1
tcriv 1 point ago +4 / -3

sorry but you're mistaken. fourth item from the top. 30 calls = 3000 shares, strike price of $1600/share, expiry January 17th, 2020

http://clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-pdfs/2018/10026982.pdf

1
thatsallphoax 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which means the option to buy the shares was purchased in 2018, WAY before the supposed inside information was acquired in congressional Coronavirus meetings.

Pelosi is corrupt, but this is fake news. Since the option expired on this day, and the current price for shares was considerably higher than the option price, the only move was to exercise the option for $1600/share. The option would have been worthless the next day, this does not indicate fraud.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
11
PelosiHalitosis 11 points ago +11 / -0

Pelousy hates the American people.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
5
DrBJTester 5 points ago +5 / -0

Little of this and a lot of that - kek

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
somercet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Greasy Nancy hates America.

9
christianknight 9 points ago +12 / -3

I like this boog quote. We need more of this on the front page.

1
sobriquet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it boog tiem nao?

8
residue69 8 points ago +8 / -0

You owe it to yourself to brush up on some H. L. Mencken quotes.

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. H. L. Mencken

I just picked up a nice little SOG Flash II.

2
2
Major_Nutt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jews love to play the persecution card. But there's got to be an underlying reason they're hated almost universally.

2
residue69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, I can't say he's wrong about that.

2
SordidPontification 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to have OP's Mencken quote on a small placard on my desk when I did tech support decades ago.

I think the customers got nervous from time to time.

2
residue69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only the ones that saw you spitting on your hands.

8
DrainNIH 8 points ago +8 / -0

Be corrupt. Get voted to the top, by corrupt buddies running corrupt elections. Make millions from corrupt rules. Go recruit to fill new vacancies. Return to the beginning.

What happened to America?

7
xopi 7 points ago +7 / -0

How did she make millions buying $5m in stock? Unless she bought options. Even cherry picking it's lowest point in the past two weeks, at 1689, with it's highest point since then, 1992, that's about an 18% increase. Even assuming those two very cherry picked numbers, she's made about $896k. Reality is probably closer to $700k.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
-1
tcriv -1 points ago +2 / -3

the pelosis do buy options. check out her financial disclosures

http://clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-search.aspx

if you're into trading, her shit is a great leading indicator.

7
JBlaze056 7 points ago +7 / -0

He constituents will applaud her insight.

7
NocturnalPatrol 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Democrat Party is the enemy of the American people.

7
Tilethewall2 7 points ago +8 / -1

Can't wait for Barr to do absolutely nothing about this.

6
warlord1 6 points ago +6 / -0

I know Trump absolutely hates Bezos and Pelosi.

It’d be hilarious if he tweeted about this.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
weneedaweedeater 3 points ago +3 / -0

How is this not insider trading?

1
SquidThrowFaux 1 point ago +1 / -0

some animals are more equal than others

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Chicitybendah 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s a long running joke on /r/WallStreetBets to follow Pelosi’s trades because she is so corrupt.

2
BetterThanReddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everywhere Pelosi goes people should show up with an empty Amazon box to protest this. It costs nothing and raises awareness of the issue.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
DearCow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely nothing surprising about that. That's what she's been doing now since you got into office, and what her father did before her.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Sapito 2 points ago +2 / -0

She plays the game well. I would really enjoy seeing her demented ass locked up.

2
Imransgarage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone catch the presser a few days back when they asked the GEOTUS if his companies were going to be able to get assistance from the CARES act?

He didn't say directly but it sounded like he allowed himself to get written out for his companies.

Anyone else catch that part of the Q&A?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Swampy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Annnnnddddd....... nothing will happen.

2
BlueEyedDevil 2 points ago +2 / -0

It says "Must be tempted" calm down faggots.

2
blueeyephoto 2 points ago +2 / -0

this shit needs fixed. If i can't buy/sell stock on insider knowledge, neither should congress. No sitting congressperson/senator/government official should be able to trade in stocks while legislating funding or dictating production.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
secretbern 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol. That title would’ve been sooooo banned on Reddit

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
phibetared 2 points ago +2 / -0

She bought on Jan 17th. That's quite a bit of time before the market TANKED. Going down makes her purchase worth less money. It has rebounded some and she is above water, but once again TRUE PUNDIT if full of misleading shit.

2
AthenaWinslow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fun fact! The United States never signed the treaty that bans the use of Letters of Marque and Reprisal. Also, given the historical evidence in the War of 1812, where private citizens were not just permitted but encouraged to outfit and crew private warships against the British, we can determine that the Founders intended the Second Amendment to extend to cannons and other large armaments.

So, legally speaking, all that's standing between you and a life of plundering Chinese cargo vessels is approval from your congressman.

2
Highdra 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based and Menckenpilled.

1
TheUnsuicidables 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guys, she had a BLIND TRUST.

Grassley was one of the four (yes, four of them massively unloaded stocks) that DIDN'T and made off like a bandit.

I criticise Grassley for his move, however the other three it is out of their hands.

1
PoohClimbsTrees 1 point ago +1 / -0

Allegedly out of their hands.

3
TheUnsuicidables 3 points ago +3 / -0

I say go ahead and investigate it then. Grassley (at least I think it was him, happened weeks ago) was caught on tape telling a bunch of friends how impactful the stuff will be a month or two in advance. Throw them all away if they have done wrong.

1
Notaspy 1 point ago +1 / -0

#emptyhospitals

God or Government

1
Anyslogan2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Capitalizing on the misfortune of Americans. How typical. She is beyond disgusting.

1
daveMac 1 point ago +1 / -0

is that not in side trading???

1
1776-or-1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, we have GOT to have term limits and NO market investment for government positions!

1
Marble68 1 point ago +1 / -0

This needs more sauce... or am I missing it?

1
DrBJTester 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cry havoc! and let slip the dogs of war. - from Julius Caesar

1
daveMac 1 point ago +1 / -0

OH!! i got to become a dem... do this and not be called OUT!!

-8
deleted -8 points ago +5 / -13
10
deleted 10 points ago +13 / -3
7
IncredibleMrE1 7 points ago +7 / -0

YUUUUGE

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
CaptainChrisPBacon 6 points ago +8 / -2

Who says we don't have them? You would be surprised.At least in The South. We are always prepared for the Norths Fuckery. The North may beat us again...but by Goddamn we will fight them to the death.Plus we have The U.S.Military. The largest percentage of the Military fighting force is from the South.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
5
christianknight 5 points ago +5 / -0

Im not sure why you are getting downvoted...the NFA and Hughes were a disaster for the nation.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4