1388
Comments (38)
sorted by:
41
deleted 41 points ago +41 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
7
IllUseAnchorBaby 7 points ago +7 / -0

Don’t let this shit depress you, that’s what they want. If someone blames trump for someone drinking fish tank cleaner, then shame them for being such a dumbfuck... it works. Mocking them and laughing in their faces is the best approach... it’s the trump way, and they have no answer for it!

2
tonightm97 2 points ago +2 / -0

What worse is every country is running trials one after the other. Not pooling research or anything.

Months and months of trials just for a treatment........

Years for a vaccine........

If there is ever a really deadly disease with a 100% kill rate. We are totally fucked.

19
YouKnowWhatItIs87 19 points ago +19 / -0

This should be touted by websites with much more traffic than techstartups.com, but alas we’re here; and I mean no slight on this outlet.

13
phibetared 13 points ago +13 / -0

Unfortunately this is NOT from New York City. It is from Monroe, NYC, which is roughly one hour northwest of NYC.

Anybody know if doctors in NYC are using the protocol with hrydoc, zpak and zinc? Or has Cuomo banned it?

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
8
uzi5v2 8 points ago +8 / -0

Cuomo is a GIGANTIC FAGGOT.

6
buco 6 points ago +6 / -0

Dr. Fauci - "That doesn't count, we need a 10 day blind study with 1,100 patients." - probably.

9
Staatssicherheit 9 points ago +12 / -3

In his first letter, Zelenko said no one had been hospitalized. In his interview with Rudy a few days ago, he said 3 people had been hospitalized. There has not been enough time for us to tell if more of his patients will be hospitalized or even die.

I think hydrochlorquine and azithromycin will become the standard of care soon. I think it will be very effective. I seriously hate how people are promoting these drugs as 100% miracle cure that will eliminate symptoms within 4 hours. There are no 100% miracle cures. Even penicillin didn't work 100% of the time it was discovered.

10
phibetared 10 points ago +10 / -0

I had a nasty cough for 5 weeks. Finally went to the doctor. He gave me a "z pak" - which at the time was brand new. Took the initial 2, an not kidding - was better 4 hours later. I couldn't believe it. I was hoping to be improved the next day. But it only took 4 hours.

So I think they 3 drug cocktail sets things up for the zpak to do it's magic. 4 hours better for some, one day for many, a few days for most/all.

7
Ragnar_Danneskjold 7 points ago +10 / -3

A Z-Pak is a brand name for azithromycin, an antibiotic. Antibiotics are only effective against bacterial infections, not viruses. Your cough was likely bacterial, so the antibiotic was able to sort that out quickly.

In the case of Wuhan, a viral infection, azithromycin is not, and cannot, directly attack the virus. It is mainly used to prevent and stop other infections that are allowed to spread due to the bodies compromised immune state while it is trying to kill the Wuhan infected cells. If your body is busy trying to figure out how to produce antibodies for Wuhan, it's a lot easier for a pneumococcus bacteria strain to take hold and give you pneumonia. The Z-Pak is meant to help with this. The hydroxychloroquine and zinc are for the virus itself by disrupting the RNA replication process of the virus.

So in short, your experience with your cough and a Z-Pak is a good anecdote concerning how effective antibiotics are for supplementary infections that might take place while someone has Wuhan, but it really has nothing to do with time frames concerning curing Wuhan itself.

9
phibetared 9 points ago +10 / -1

True, but it has everything to do with saving the patient's life if they are going to be killed by one of the supplementary infections. Plus according to the French doctor report, the combination of azithromycin with hydrochlorine (?) did a better job that H alone - when measuring reduction in virus. So there is an interaction effect of some sort.

6
lurkingsince2006 6 points ago +6 / -0

Azithromycin also has antiviral properties itself. Google it.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
Kolob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some people have allergic reactions and people with heart conditions can't take it. Aside from that fantastic. Ben McAdams had the treatment and got well fast

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
DisavowtheCucks 6 points ago +6 / -0

They’ll deny it refute say ‘we should be cautious’ all because they want to prolong this crisis to hurt President Trump. Faggot losers and traitors!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
PatrickSebast 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Vladamir" Zelenko?! That sounds like a Russian ploy. Russians are hacking our viruses now to get Trump elected!

4
patriot51 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm surprised the deep state hasn't put out a hit on him yet.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
midgetpornrocks 3 points ago +3 / -0

MUH RUSSIA!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
eatthesejewels 1 point ago +2 / -1

Any statistics on age? Would be super impressive if a significant percentage of patients were in an at risk demographic. I hope it's not a bunch of kids in their 20's.

2
phibetared 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's inferred. Older people are more likely to have other pre-existing conditions, and to have developed respiratory conditions. That's where the treatment excels. For the most part, younger folks get flu symptoms and recover on their own .

-13
Old_ex_Commie -13 points ago +2 / -15

No, it's not 100% success. He removes the patients that die from his "study."

This is not how science works.

9
Daisymae [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

What is your source? Do you have a link?

-14
Old_ex_Commie -14 points ago +2 / -16

Here's my link, but I was thinking about the wrong doctor:

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/insane-many-scientists-lament-trump-s-embrace-risky-malaria-drugs-coronavirus

In the case of Zelenko, it is all anecdotal. He has yet to do a proper clinical study.

9
thxpk 9 points ago +9 / -0

They left the study, he didn’t remove them and even if you add them back the cure rate is still very high and he’s released another study with much higher numbers so stop spreading bullshit here.

5
Ragnar_Danneskjold 5 points ago +6 / -1

But others have.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758v1

Here's a properly done double blind clinical study that demonstrates Hydroxychloroquine had measurable positive impact on outcomes.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
merkmerk73 2 points ago +4 / -2

It's not a study because he's not using a group of patients as a control group, and I'm fine with that.

However, I think there's something fishy with this guy

Mainly the sheer volume of patients he's claiming to have - I find it hard to believe he's seeing 600 coronavirus patients in the area of NY he's in.

I'm in DFW and we don't even have that many total in DFW as far as I know. It just doesn't smell right.

3
-t-h-e-t-r-u-t-h- 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well he is conducting his study in Kiryas Joel, a Hasidic community of about 35k. The number of Covid infections in there are quite high in relation to the surrounding towns because of how the village is situated. That many people within a mile or two radius is going to have a high level of concentration.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
merkmerk73 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have no doubt the drug will be the cure and treatment of choice

I just think something is fishy about this Dr Zelenko story

5
Basedcubandude 5 points ago +5 / -0

Prove it.