2690
Comments (125)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
99
Count_Dyscalculia 99 points ago +99 / -0

Only after the one where the Royals let her in in the first place.

43
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 43 points ago +43 / -0

It is amazing that they allowed an actual prostitute into the royal family.

28
PROCIsAsshoe 28 points ago +28 / -0

'Yacht girls' are just strong, empowered female stewardesses!!! /s

8
asparaghosi 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fierce nautical nookie! Slay!!!

12
snuggs316 12 points ago +12 / -0

historical precedent: see also, wallis simpson.

17
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 17 points ago +17 / -0

Somewhat of a precedent, true. But whereas Wallis was by all accounts an unfaithful slag, Megan was an actual prostitute, working as a "yacht girl". There are definitely many similarities between them though and they were both able to successfully cuck their respective princes.

11
buco 11 points ago +11 / -0

They already had a pedo, round out the family with a pro.

5
Southern_Belle 5 points ago +5 / -0

My theory: she's a cabal plant designed to destroy one of the iconic institutions of British culture.

Probably a crypto-Rothschild.

18
deathcat 18 points ago +18 / -0

He thought she'd be well received like Princess Diana. The difference is that Diana wasn't a whore.

11
PosterIsDead 11 points ago +12 / -1

Well. . . . not at first . . . .

4
Meddlesom 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even still, neither of these decisions were worse than when the royals decided to give control over the country to a parliament. It's been all downhill for the brits since then... they lost a global empire.