posted ago by ThreeGuysGameStudio
+38 / -0
...if it was, there is a 100% chance it was released in more than 1 location to ensure worldwide spread. This would result in some early cases throughout the globe with no traceable connection to Wuhan.
If we can find evidence that this is indeed the case, it would go a long way toward knowing wtf happened.
I've heard at least a few accounts that this is true, but can't find scientific case studies yet myself, so I figured why not crowd source the research?
If enough early cases have no traceable connection to Wuhan, is there another viable explanation besides it was released at multiple locations?
I would love to know what lead to the the outbreak at the nursing home in Washington.
"if it was, there is a 100% chance it was released in more than 1 location to ensure worldwide spread" I think this is potentially a bad foundation to base a subsequent assumption on. It makes sense, but by no means is that premise 100% certain, they could keep going trying to infect the same location until it works. Not very hard to get the virus around and spread it.
this approach only works if you want to make sure it spreads in that area, not if you want to ensure a world-wide pandemic.
But also, wouldn't searching for the cases as I suggested give us an indication of whether the theory is valid?
Thing is, spread can start before its really ever known. Say it starts in Wuhan, 7 people get it the first day, 1 goes to NYC, spreads to 6 people, one of the NYC cases dies before one of the Wuhan virus. I dont know that finding the location really tells us anything.
There are so many possibilities it's difficult to even begin. Here is a wildly unpopular theory i'll throw out there.
China is right, it came from the us. The deep state frames China by releasing it next to their biolab. They also release it in la and ny. They short the market, spread panic, cash in while Trump's economy crashes, provide the possibility of a Trump war with China, and have an excuse to grab power and God knows what else.
Why would China release it purposely in wuhan? There is no logic to that.
Most of the early cases in every country are connected directly to Wuhan. The CCP thought they could contain it internally before anyone knew it existed, and they wanted to do that because they knew it would be traced back to their nasty wet markets. In their effort to cover it up they prevented anyone from addressing the problem until it was too late.
Yeah, but that's predictable in either case because countries were only testing people who could prove contact w/Wuhan or someone else who had it...so doesn't mean anything.
What would mean something is if we identify the cases that had no connection, and how many of them there were.
Unfortunately, even if we develop an antibody test it's not going to tell us when people got infected. All we really know for sure is that we can't trust China.
I wouldn't be surprised if it we're just a cleaner at the lab trying to make a couple extra bucks at the wet market and sold them some infected animals?
Well, like I said, that's why looking for documented cases of early infection of people without connections to Wuhan across the globe would be very relevant.
I know I heard of at least one early on in San Diego with no connection to Wuhan. Then there's the nursing home in Washington. There has to be more, but I'm having difficulty finding any real reporting or articles on this particular type of situation.