127
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
PotatoFarmer20 2 points ago +6 / -4

More than grains. The people who are shilling (yes, shilling) against Q have not read any of it. Or followed it at all. They read msm reports and decided that the media was being honest about Q because it fit their preconceived notions. The definition of confirmation bias.

Makes me wonder if these people are from ShareBlue or CTR. Too late to read it all and catch up now. So they attack something they havent ever taken the time to understand. "Rules for Radicals" level ignorance. Sad really.

Not to mention its a wonderfully subversive tactic to keep two groups of TRUMP SUPPORTERS fighting amongst each other. I wish the mods would just ban Q talk like the other sub, so the shills cant use these divide and conquer techniques. Yeah... It isnt a win for free speech, but its one less tool in the shill's toolbox.

3
Harambe 3 points ago +6 / -3

Or the people shilling against Q have read more than you and were able to see through the lies.

Stop thinking you're intellectually superior to Q doubters. You're not.

2
PotatoFarmer20 2 points ago +4 / -2

Thats whats so funny. Its never Q readers who start the attacks. Its always you doubters. And thats fine. We can all take it. You apparently cant. Case in point. I make a point, you attack me. Standard operating procedure... For the left.

Its also ironic that you say you've read more than i have.... Books, news, Q, or otherwise. Wrong. Simply wrong.

Have you ever read any of it?