463
Comments (41)
sorted by:
20
deleted 20 points ago +24 / -4
3
RefuseBin [S] 3 points ago +8 / -5

AIDS .. get it from transfusions (necessary), drugs (epidemic), heterosexual and A LOT OF HOMOSEXUAL sex, blood splashing, sharing contaminated products... etc. Either way, 20K die each year "complications from" AIDS

770,000 around the world.

11
HillarysBeaverMunch 11 points ago +12 / -1

But it's mostly gay buttsex.

1
teh_dahnald 1 point ago +1 / -0

and straight buttsex. its the buttsex that is the problem

1
HillarysBeaverMunch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am of 2 minds on this topic.

Like a gay mans anus on date night, I'm torn.

0
RefuseBin [S] 0 points ago +3 / -3

They do like their butt stuff.

2
HillarysBeaverMunch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who doesn't? It's the massive irresponsibility that makes me lose all respect.

That, and felching.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
HillarysBeaverMunch 1 point ago +1 / -0

At the heart of homosexuality is coprophilia.

They call it poo flinging.

-5
nothingberg -5 points ago +2 / -7

So what? That's not the point of this post. Stay on topic, otherwise your homobigot concerntrolling---in fact that's exactly what you are doing

The point of this post is that it's bullshit that AIDS has not been cured OR made into a vaccine in 30+ yrs but in just 2 months they have a vaccine for corona

KEEP IN MIND whether you are antihomo or not, YOU TOO HAVE PAID for aids research out of your taxes. That should upset you, BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN WASTED

That smells like a conspiracy. But you know, keep talking about gaysex since your'e really obsessed about it

1
HillarysBeaverMunch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will keep talking about it, and felching too!

3
uvontheterrible 3 points ago +6 / -3

Are you really trying to say that aids is remotely similar to coronavirus in terms of how easy it is to spread? That's absurd.

The vast, vast majority of people who get aids get it from engaging in risky activities they can easily avoid. The same is not true for coronavirus.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
MichaelDenny 0 points ago +1 / -1

Maybe cause it’s the sixth time you’ve said it? 🙄

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
RefuseBin [S] 0 points ago +4 / -4

Fine.. FLU

That make you feel better?

FLU no one does anything to stop but kills hundreds of thousands DIRECTLY

There is no direct cure. Vaccines only work on certain strains.

There. Same results.

0
nothingberg 0 points ago +1 / -1

Please enlighten us on the distinct differences between a retrovirus and rna virus and why it would be SO SO SO much harder that 35 yrs and billions of dollars dumped into aids research is somehow on parity with 2 months of production

Please explain, PhD virologist. Thanks in advance

0
Razeontherock 0 points ago +1 / -1

No that's not what was said AT ALL.

The comparison is the gravity of the epidemic, vs the response to it. THAT is what is absurd!

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
4
Razeontherock 4 points ago +5 / -1

You're missing the point. Look at the gravity of the 2 epidemics, and the response. That is the comparison being made.

Your technicalities are beside the point (even though they are correct)

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
0
nothingberg 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes AIDS kills way more people each year than coronavirus will, esp if we stay indoors and keep our distance, and take the cure which is hydroxychloroquine zinc and azithromycin and get the epidemic under control

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
1
Juzeza 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're missing his point. It's the relative impact, not the transmission that he's making a point about.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
RefuseBin [S] 0 points ago +4 / -4

And "close" is not enough by the way.

Most doctors agree it requires a stagnant series of events for that to occur but you touching yourself helps.

That shd have been the joke..

COVID you get from touching yourself.

AIDS you get from touching others.

-2
nothingberg -2 points ago +1 / -3

What's that have to do with anything?

You think homosexuals (and people who get it from transfustions or from treating bulletwounds of others with hiv) deserve to die?

5
Fenix 5 points ago +5 / -0

HIV meds bring in billions and billions in revenue. They don't ever want to cure it. They just want to treat it for the rest of someones life.

4
dukeofdoorcounty 4 points ago +4 / -0

So 200-500 jobs lost and lives ruined for every person "saved", according to the models? What a deal!

2
Razeontherock 2 points ago +3 / -1

$1B cost for every person dead.

F-35 is cheaper. We don't have 6000 of them. Heck we don't even have 200 F-22

2
Dog_star_man 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shared needles is becoming more common, so is rape from someone whom has HIV, or someone keeping it a secret from their partner. Sadly.

2
TexasTrumpWhisperer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its all about transference. China Virus - breathe on someone... HIV - blood, vaginal fluid, or jizz loads. One on these is not like the other.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ShitComment 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not throw cancer in there while we're doing the whole correlation doesn't equals causation thing?

1
sixfingerdildo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aids has a foundation and lobbyists dedicated to it. It's the belle of the viral ball. Kung Flu is the unsophisticated raggamuffin that just looks and acts like every other virus before it. There's nothing "sexy" about. pun intended.

1
lurker247 1 point ago +2 / -1

Unpopular Opinion:

More babies are being born than people dying combined. More people are dying from car crashes, flu, drowning, alcoholism, etc than this by far....but THIS is where we draw the line to shut down the economy and shutter everyone in their houses. We have a remedy with hydroxychloroquine. So if people get it, then administer and move on.

We have too many people on this planet, let the virus take it's natural course. Shocking result: some thousands will die, but many thousands more will be born. The cycle of life is complete.

1
Ma5e 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, AIDS isn't as contagious. But at the same time, test kits were faulty to the point that even those who didn't have it were lumped in with those who did, increasing the likelihood of transmission. I would even go a step further and say that those faulty test kits help spread the virus

1
BoughtByBloomberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Counter point. You aren't getting AIDS without blood contact. If you aren't a druggie, in a horrible car accident, having gay but sex or a bloody gummed hobo gives you a zombie nibble you're safe.

Chinese plague will get you just by getting one of those defective Chinese masks one of them coofed on.

Difference in vector and potential damage. AIDS is also a stimulus for the economy with all the money spent treating it, CCP virus can be treated with a few dollars worth of chloroquine.

0
Baryonic 0 points ago +1 / -1

They are very different viruses and you can make a vaccine pretty easily - but ensuring it is effective is another story.

HIV is a retrovirus that writes itself into your immune cells. Once you have it - its always running and you have to constantly throw monkey wrenches into its machinery to keep it from getting an edge on your immune system. But its constantly evolving and trying to outpace your immunity.

The Wuhan Flu is not a retrovirus so you can be cleared of it -- but it has a capsid and receptor set your immune system is completely foreign to --- but it has keys to your cells. That is why its so bad. Your immune system does not know you are sick until they start blowing up cells.